Fix your internal business process problems, rather than trying to find software to allow you to create unmanagable nightmare "solutions".
This stuff is all perfect textbook examples of *why* Observium doesn't allow you to do this stuff. One of our design goals is to promote good engineering practices, since our primary target market is service providers and small telcos.
If you have a switch port which is plugged in to a server, that should be documented in the port description on the switch. This allows everyone to see that information, with no information desync between the switch's configuration and the monitoring system. Otherwise it is a virtual certainty that within 12 months, 20% of your ports have incorrect descriptions in the monitoring system, because they won't have been updated.
adam.
Sent from Mailbird [http://www.getmailbird.com/?utm_source=Mailbird&utm_medium=email&utm...] On 22/05/2015 14:14:20, Farshid Abediny farshidabediny@gmail.com wrote: Because on switch port NOC team set their own description and on monitoring server we want set our installation team description (like server label and etc) Is there anyway do this? Thanks
On Friday, May 22, 2015, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org [mailto:adama@memetic.org]> wrote:
No. Community Edition is the trial.
Why would anyone want to manually set descriptions in a monitoring system and not set them on the devices themselves? oO
adam.
Sent from Mailbird [http://www.getmailbird.com/?utm_source=Mailbird&utm_medium=email&utm...] On 22/05/2015 14:03:49, Farshid Abediny farshidabediny@gmail.com wrote: Do you have any trial for pro version? And also can we set custom field for port switch? Or add description to every port switch manually without change description on cisco switch Than
On Friday, May 22, 2015, Mark D. Nagel mnagel@willingminds.com wrote:
On 5/22/2015 5:55 AM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
You can fetch the in/out/95th/etc data for each billing period from the database, or you can drag all of the measurements and work that stuff out yourself if you want a different billing style, and just use observium as a poller.
Well, 95th for links in which the actual speed is known, correct? We still have no general method to signal Observium about links with sub-port speeds, like 100Mbps ethernet ports connected to a 12/2 cable modem, right? Or did I miss that in an update?
Thanks, Mark
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium] _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium