I am !! In a production environment we may avoid bugs and more risky problems (like an insane SNMP discoverer, or something like that).

So I’ll be interested in a stable branch, regularly updated :-)

I think the most important things are :

1) Stability

2) “Silence” – in terms of not talking too much on the network

3) Performance

4) Without less information or functionality than the latest updates

Regards,

Adrien BERTRAND

Administrateur Sécurité du Système d'Information

Tel : 01.42.79.47.81

Interne : 5.47.81

**************************************************************************

Subject: Re: [Observium] Stable vs Trunk

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hi,

> As it turns out, waiting for a bit of software to feel un-buggy enough

> to call stable is a little bit like chasing a magic dragon in a

> pharmaceutically-enhanced dream, a largely unattainable goal. It's a

> little difficult to gauge stability when we have half a dozen commits

> per day!

> Are any of you using the stable branch, and if so, how often and under

> what conditions would you want me to merge changes?

Nobody interested in the stable branch?

Tom