That Makes sense.
—jeff
From: Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> Reply-To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 3:47 PM To: "observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org" <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] PIX ASA
We ignore all non-physical interface types (or, the ones who know about that we see regularly).
If you're using contexts, there won't be any physical interfaces, thus nothing to graph!
adam.
Sent from Mailbirdhttp://www.getmailbird.com/?utm_source=Mailbird&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=sent-from-mailbird
On 06/05/2015 21:02:29, Jeffrey d'Ambly <jeffrey.dambly@jasper.commailto:jeffrey.dambly@jasper.com> wrote:
Here is a pastebin of my inside interface.
http://pastebin.com/TtJPVg3V —jeff
From: Ron Marosko <ron@rjr-services.commailto:ron@rjr-services.com> Organization: RJR Services, Inc. Reply-To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 12:54 PM To: 'Observium Network Observation System' <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] PIX ASA
Interestingly, mine are showing up as type “L2 VLAN (802.1q)” on the actual ports page, so it may be something different?
From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey d'Ambly Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 2:32 PM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] PIX ASA
Looking at the ports, they are ifType propVirtual, would it make sense to add this type to $port_types in ports.inc.php
$port_types=array(
'Ethernet',
'L2 VLAN (802.1Q)',
'L3 VLAN (IP)',
'L3 VLAN (IPX)',
'Virtual/Internal',
'Tunnel',
'Loopback',
'Other',
);
From: Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> Reply-To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 11:44 AM To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] PIX ASA
Looks like all of the interfaces on that model of pix are being excluded from the device graph.
I bet Cisco has them set as "virtual" or something...
Adam.
Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com
On 6 May 2015 19:25:05 "Jeffrey d'Ambly" <jeffrey.dambly@jasper.commailto:jeffrey.dambly@jasper.com> wrote: Performance & Output RRDTool Output: ERROR: String ends after the = sign on 'CDEF:inB=' Total time: 0.014 | RRDtool time: 0.012s
And a patebin of it all.
—jeff
From: Tom Laermans <tom.laermans@powersource.cxmailto:tom.laermans@powersource.cx> Reply-To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 11:19 AM To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] PIX ASA
Click on the graph to get a bigger error graph, then click rrdtool output, then pastebin the result :-)
Tom
On 06/05/2015 20:10, Jeffrey d'Ambly wrote: I just aded a PIX asa and for some reason it looks like my aggregate graph on the overview tab is not working (see graph below)
what’s really odd is that I can see the individual graphs for each of the interfaces. How can I trouble shoot this?
[cid:part1.04020103.01030301@powersource.cx]
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium