![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2c5e8b107b70d8de079d5b370e683a92.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
I am dealing with the a similar issue on one of my 7600s running 15.3(3)s. When I walk the device in the system mib, it crawls. So far, Cisco TAC hasn't come up with any substantial ideas.
If you run a debug of the poller on that device id does it take a long time on any of the bulkwalks? I also set my timeout in global config to 3 seconds. When I did that I got breaks in the graph; however, that is supposed to happen since my device is slow to respond via SNMP. If I increase my timeout in global config I get a better graph but the poller doesn't complete.
Mike
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 7:00 AM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Ideas on Packet Loss?
VPN === Firewall -> connection limits?
Alternatively, shitty OS with shitty SNMP Stack.
SNMP can be a bit fickle on some hardware.
adam.
On 2013-11-22 14:55, Ryan Milton wrote:
Attached is a picture of one device in the network that keeps throwing a fit. I regularly get the notice that it is down (Netscreen 204) and that there is packet loss. Now I think that the two issues may be different. When I "get clock," I show UP 1741 hours. Is this an issue with Observium? If so, I don't know how to change that. I have my Observium server in the same rack as the device in question.
Otherwise, it's something with my hardware--obviously.
I know that I may feel the wrath of Adam, but I'm trying to narrow down what ISN'T the issue.
Regards,
Ryan Milton
MVS Network Manager
o: 201-447-1505 x124
c: 862-249-5230
www.mvsusa.com [1]
Links:
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium