One of our instances polls just over 200 devices (mostly in the same site) with 16 workers and completes in normally around 80 seconds.
[2016/03/22 21:56:28 -0400] poller-wrapper.py(21016): /opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py: polled 202 devices in 86 seconds with 16 workers
The VM runs on a Pure Storage SSD array though. Maybe try turning your pollers down? In the logs folder obvervium.log should tell you how long it's taking to poll all your devices, what do those average?
*Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sryan@arbor.net *Arbor Networks* +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m) www.arbornetworks.com
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
Are you sure having 24 threads is a good idea?
Gaps like these are usually caused by network issues, or poller processes getting stacked up and interfering with one another.
You can try using the new 'experimental' ports poller mode :
$config['enable_ports_separate_walk'] = 1;
You'll be able to see on the poller information screen if it's had a positive/negative effect.
adam.
On 23/03/2016 01:50:43, Pui Edylie email@edylie.net wrote: 33 */6 * * * root /opt/observium/discovery.php -h all >> /dev/null 2>&1 */5 * * * * root /opt/observium/discovery.php -h new >> /dev/null 2>&1 */5 * * * * root /opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py 24 >> /dev/null 2>&1
On 3/23/2016 9:46 AM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
show me :
cat /etc/cron.d/observium
adam.
On 23/03/2016 01:37:31, Pui Edylie email@edylie.net email@edylie.net wrote: Dear Members,
We are running latest commercial version and currently we have about 260 devices with 24 probers.
We are getting graph that is breaking up but the link is ok.
Anyone has any idea?
Thanks!
Regards, Edy
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium