I would, yes.

(create a stable branch)

And yes, I broke the thread with my mobile client especially for you :D

Sent from my mobile, please excuse brevity and spelling errors.

----- Reply message -----
From: "Nikolay Shopik" <shopik@inblock.ru>
To: "Observium Network Observation System" <observium@observium.org>
Subject: [Observium] Pages Missing CSS
Date: Mon, Aug 5, 2013 17:08

Would you introduce "stable" branch if someone start paying for it? :-D

You see fixes are fixes, but most bugs comes when you start introducing
new feature called "global domination" and this is where things get
worse then just getting fixes.

Its just selecting between I need this fix, but this brake that, because
of new thing here, and I need choice what are more important for me.

I know fixing bugs are boring, and introducing new features (yay \o/)
are more fun. :)

But its understandable why no stable exist for now, no man power to do
qa and backport shit here and there, like in any pet projects, muhahaha.

On 02/08/13 01:05, Adam Armstrong wrote:
> On 2013-08-01 21:52, Job Snijders wrote:
>> Isn't it your job to do QA?
>>
>> If you favor stability why would you do 'svn up' on a production
>> element? :)
>
> Quite right. And for people who can't or don't want to do this
> themselves, we can take their money in exchange for managing their
> installation updates and maintenance :)
>
> adam.
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium