*latter is end of life
EB
Games
|
ZiNG
Pop Culture | Peter Watts
From: observium <observium-bounces@observium.org>
On Behalf Of Peter Watts via observium
Sent: Monday, 25 February 2019 8:01 AM
To: Mike Stupalov <mike@observium.org>
Cc: Peter Watts <Peter.Watts@ebgames.com>; Observium <observium@observium.org>
Subject: Re: [Observium] SNMP hardware detection bugged
The C887VA-K9 is the successor the CISCO887VA-K9. They are functionally similar with a few subtle differences, however more significantly they do run different versions of IOS and the former* is effectively
end of life so configuration syntax will continue to diverge going forward.
There’s a brief comparison here:
https://blog.router-switch.com/2017/06/cisco-800-series-router-migration-option/
End of life notice:
The entPhysicalName attribute will allow us to distinguish the models, so that would be great! Thanks
EB
Games
|
ZiNG
Pop Culture | Peter Watts
From: Mike Stupalov <mike@stupalov.ru>
On Behalf Of Mike Stupalov
Sent: Friday, 22 February 2019 10:42 PM
To: Peter Watts <Peter.Watts@ebgames.com>
Cc: Observium <observium@observium.org>
Subject: Re: [Observium] SNMP hardware detection bugged
Hi Peter,
what the different?
This is correct Cisco part name.
I can leave hardware just as 887VA (as used in entPhysicalName).
That ok?
Peter Watts wrote on 22/02/2019 02:10:
Hey Mike,
I would consider it to be less correct now. The C887VA-K9 and CISCO887VA-K9 are quite different hardware despite the similar names. It would be useful to distinguish between them.
EB Games | ZiNG Pop Culture | Peter Watts
From: Mike Stupalov <mike@stupalov.ru> On Behalf Of Mike Stupalov
Sent: Friday, 22 February 2019 8:53 AM
To: Observium <observium@observium.org>; Peter Watts via observium <observium@observium.org>
Cc: Peter Watts <Peter.Watts@ebgames.com>
Subject: Re: [Observium] SNMP hardware detection bugged
Hi,
this is exactly correct (not bug).
Full hardware name is "Cisco C887VA", where "Cisco" now stored in vendor field and "C887VA-K9" in hardware field:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/routers/c887va-integrated-services-routers/model.html
And yes, that was changed 2 days ago to this more correctly names.
Peter Watts via observium wrote on 22/02/2019 01:30:
We have a few hundred Cisco 880 series routers (approximately four different variants). Since ~4 days ago, they’re all getting reported as the same hardware now – C887VA-K9
Here’s an example – actually is a CISCO887VA-K9 – from poller.php 19.2.9721:
##### Module Start: os #####
o OS Poller Group
o Vendor Cisco
o Hardware C887VA-K9
o Version 15.3(3)M9
o Features UNIVERSALK9
o Serial FGL1811239Z
o Asset <empty>
From snmpget:
(entPhysicalDescr) iso.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1.1.2.1 = STRING: "887VA chassis, Hw Serial#: FGL1811239Z, Hw Revision: 1.0"
(entPhysicalContainedIn) iso.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1.1.4.1 = INTEGER: 0
(entPhysicalName) iso.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1.1.7.1 = STRING: "887VA"
(entPhysicalSoftwareRev) iso.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1.1.10.1 = STRING: "15.3(3)M9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)"
(entPhysicalSerialNum) iso.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1.1.11.1 = STRING: " FGL1811239Z"
(entPhysicalModelName) iso.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1.1.13.1 = STRING: "CISCO887VA-K9"
In the device logs:
2019-02-18 08:46:04 aus0264-r1 Hardware changed: 'CISCO887VA-K9' -> 'C887VA-K9'
EB Games | ZiNG Pop Culture | Peter Watts | Infrastructure Supervisor | Australia & New Zealand | Peter.Watts@ebgames.com | +61 7 3860 7757 | 0438 636 110
_______________________________________________observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
Mike Stupalov
Observium Limited, http://observium.org
--
Mike Stupalov
Observium Limited, http://observium.org