Thanks adam!
Tony Guadagno O +1 585 577 1003 C +1 585 703 6700 E tonyg@guadagnoconsulting.commailto:tonyg@guadagnoconsulting.com [cid:image001.jpg@01DC23EE.EEEC89A0]
From: Adam Armstrong via observium observium@lists.observium.org Sent: Friday, September 12, 2025 1:23 PM To: Observium observium@lists.observium.org Cc: Adam Armstrong adama@observium.org Subject: [Observium] Re: suggestion for cisco asa firewall graphs
I rmemeber making this graph, and vaguely recall it being dumb.
There are overlapping categories of OIDs, I’ll have to look at it again.
Adam.
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 Sep 2025, at 20:39, Tony Guadagno via observium <observium@lists.observium.orgmailto:observium@lists.observium.org> wrote: Hi, I have been spending a lot of time with this graph (firewalls/graphs/firewalls/Remote Access sessions) and I am noticing something that does not make sense.. <image001.png>
In this graph, you can see that I have 4 ssl tunnels and 13 lan-to-lan tunnels. Observium seems to be showing this as a stacked graph but I don’t think that makes sense. When I get more sslvpn tunnels, it is bumping up the gold section which indicates lan-to-lan but it should not, lan-to-lan sessions are independent of sslvpn connections
I would suggest that this should NOT be stacked….is it possible to make that change?
thanks Tony Guadagno O +1 585 577 1003 C +1 585 703 6700 E tonyg@guadagnoconsulting.commailto:tonyg@guadagnoconsulting.com <image002.jpg>
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list -- observium@lists.observium.orgmailto:observium@lists.observium.org To unsubscribe send an email to observium-leave@lists.observium.orgmailto:observium-leave@lists.observium.org
