Dear Adam,
It’s actually all in my initial email. Target devices aren’t anymore, those PEs were unplugged.
I kept the configuration in the RRs routers in order to save some time when re-deploying in a near future. That’s how I discovered the “issue”.
Would like me to provide you with some debug traces ?
Best regards.
Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR -
Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr |
|
Web : prodware.fr |
De :
observium <observium-bounces@observium.org> au nom de Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org>
Répondre à : Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.org>
Date : vendredi 6 janvier 2017 12:51
À : "observium@observium.org" <observium@observium.org>
Objet : Re: [Observium] Possible bug with BGP IPv6 sessions state alert checker
You're not giving any actual useful information. What are those devices actually returning?
Put your mouse over the (i) icon.
adam.
On 06/01/2017 08:37:02, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR <ybzahr@prodware.fr> wrote:
Dear Adam,
Actually, I checked a lot before sending the email. If I can avoid noise, I will always choose to do so.
My check is pretty simple : I would like to detect as errors BGP sessions that are AdminEnabled (ie not shutdown) and that aren’t in Established state. Theese could be problematic for any kind of reason.
For this particular example I gave, same check works just fine for IPv4 for this old peers :
This has been confirmed on two routeurs acting as RRs :
telnet@rr01-par01#sh ip bgp summary
Neighbor Address AS# State Time Rt:Accepted Filtered Sent ToSend
X.Y.Z.2 ABCDE ESTAB 369d 5h59m 3 0 621434 1
X.Y.Z.3 ABCDE ESTAB 369d 6h 4m 406952 0 214471 12
X.Y.Z.4 ABCDE ESTAB 369d 6h 2m 59865 0 597987 1
X.Y.Z.5 ABCDE ADMDN 369d10h23m 0 0 0 0
X.Y.Z.6 ABCDE ADMDN 369d10h23m 0 0 0 0
X.Y.Z.7 ABCDE ESTAB> 369d 5h59m 195213 0 510924 1
X.Y.Z.8 ABCDE ESTAB 369d 5h59m 397106 0 540911 1
But, for IPv6 counter-part, it’s not working.
Maybe I’m actually missing something. If so, enlighten me with your wisdom.
Respectfully.
Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR - Consultant Expert
Prodware France
T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr
Web : prodware.fr
De : observium <observium-bounces@observium.org> au nom de Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org>
Répondre à : Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.org>
Date : jeudi 5 janvier 2017 22:33
À : "observium@observium.org" <observium@observium.org>
Objet : Re: [Observium] Possible bug with BGP IPv6 sessions state alert checker
Does bgpPeerAdminStatus not equals "stop" and bgpPeerState not equals "established"?
What, you didn't check before emailing?
Why not?
adam.
On 05/01/2017 20:54:49, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR <ybzahr@prodware.fr> wrote:
Dear all,
I have configured a simple BGP checker alert based on the provided example in observium’s website :
This works just fine for IPv4, but something is clearly wrong with IPv6 as some IPv6 BGP sessions show up in error.
This is an example from two Brocade CER-RT routers acting BGP route reflectors for a bunch of PEs. They are showing the exact same error :
IPv6 addresses DEAD:BEEF:CAFE::5 and DEAD:BEEF:CAFE::6 are loopbacks used to used by former PEs.
If I look at the BGP sessions state on the routers themselves, you can that I have willingly administratively shutdown the sessions :
telnet@rr01-par01#sh ipv bgp summary
Neighbor Address AS# State Time Rt:Accepted Filtered Sent ToSend
DEAD:BEEF:CAFE::2 XYZ ESTAB 366d 8h29m 2 0 32985 0
DEAD:BEEF:CAFE::3 XYZ ESTAB 366d 8h18m 24074 0 8911 0
DEAD:BEEF:CAFE::4 XYZ ESTAB 366d 8h16m 1790 0 32360 0
DEAD:BEEF:CAFE::5 XYZ ADMDN 366d12h37m 0 0 0 0
DEAD:BEEF:CAFE::6 XYZ ADMDN 366d12h37m 0 0 0 0
DEAD:BEEF:CAFE::7 XYZ CONN 357d12h10m 0 0 0 32985
DEAD:BEEF:CAFE::8 XYZ ESTAB 366d12h37m 32453 0 24701 0
Rest of alert checks for IPv4 and IPv6 sessions are fine.
Any hints about this ? Any traces I could provide ?
Best regards.
Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR - Consultant Expert
Prodware France
T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr
Web : prodware.fr