![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/654736c2c28f22ba6a13429dde6a77bf.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
So it should look like:
processor_usage greater 90 * processor
Thank you.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@observium.org wrote:
These are "device" alerts not "processor" alerts. The entity type is important!
If you recreate them as "processor" type (as they are in our examples), they'll work.
adam.
Adam Armstrong CEO & Lead Architect Observium Limited
On 2017-10-13 19:48:29, J Green corpengineer@gmail.com wrote: Please find attached.
Thank you.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
Lack of screenshots will practically guarantee no one is going to try to work out what you've done wrong.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=10777 On 13 Oct 2017, at 19:23, J Green corpengineer@gmail.com wrote:
Hello there:
Just built a new system w/ CE version 17.9 on Centos 7.2 . When I create/run the following Alert Check, it shows as 'OK' for my devices:
processor_usage greater 90 * *
When I go to a device and view graphs, it shows a device w/ 100% CPU utilization
No errors in logs/db.log.
Is my syntax incorrect?
Thank you.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/ cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium