Well, seems that's our list drama for the winter sorted.
He's been removed and banned, so no need to reply to him. :)
BACK TO OUR NORMAL PROGRAMMING. NOTHING TO SEE HERE! ------ Original Message ------ From: "Bryde, Ole" Ole.Bryde@sonymobile.com To: "'Adam Armstrong'" adama@memetic.org; "'Observium Network Observation System'" observium@observium.org Sent: 11/14/2014 1:09:44 AM Subject: RE: [Observium] FW: Re[6]: Performance
I wish you good luck and hope you get well soon. Please confirm that you will cancel the subscription. Br Ole Bryde
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong Sent: den 14 november 2014 08:06 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] FW: Re[6]: Performance
You need to look up the word "harass". You're the one harassing me.
Fuck off.
------ Original Message ------ From: "Bryde, Ole" Ole.Bryde@sonymobile.com To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: 11/14/2014 1:03:39 AM Subject: [Observium] FW: Re[6]: Performance
Well, aint you the perfect gentleman. I want to cancel my subscription for Observium, that should be pretty obvious. You constantly harass and abuse the people in the mailinglist, why ? The platform you provided is pretty good, but does that in any way compensate for you poor manners ? I have no idea what is eating you, but as you so elegantly put it, I most certainly will "Go away" Also , as you are well aware, I have never utilized the subscription , so maybe a refund would be in place.. I urge you to get some social training or at least get laid once in a while, could do you some actual good.
Have a nice day Br Ole Bryde
-----Original Message----- From: Adam Armstrong [mailto:adama@memetic.org] Sent: den 14 november 2014 07:50 To: Bryde, Ole Subject: Re[6]: [Observium] Performance
You got irritated that I said something mean about something you have deployed on the mailing list so you felt the need to email me *directly* to display your irritation like some kind of passive aggressive alpha-neckbeard.
I don't give a fuck what you think. Go away.
adam.
------ Original Message ------ From: "Bryde, Ole" Ole.Bryde@sonymobile.com To: "'Adam Armstrong'" adama@memetic.org Sent: 11/14/2014 12:46:22 AM Subject: RE: Re[4]: [Observium] Performance
So you are basically calling me a liar? Wow.
Ole
-----Original Message----- From: Adam Armstrong [mailto:adama@memetic.org] Sent: den 14 november 2014 07:43 To: Bryde, Ole Subject: Re[4]: [Observium] Performance
I long ago learned not to believe a single word said by someone who is defending something they have deployed.
adam.
------ Original Message ------ From: "Bryde, Ole" Ole.Bryde@sonymobile.com To: "'Adam Armstrong'" adama@memetic.org Sent: 11/14/2014 12:28:50 AM Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Observium] Performance
Well , I guess we have different experiences then. We have VSS pairs that have been running perfectly for several years. (including patching) We have stacks for our access layer that works just fine.
You provide us with a great product, to unbeatable price, but, pissing up your "customers" leg could be considered rude. No ?
//Ole
-----Original Message----- From: Adam Armstrong [mailto:adama@memetic.org] Sent: den 14 november 2014 07:20 To: Bryde, Ole Subject: Re[2]: [Observium] Performance
Greatly increased surface area for software failure.
Pretty much every deployment of stacked/virtual chassis switches I've encountered has had issues be them simple performance issues from intra-stack communication to serious problems like configuration corruption and instability.
VSS is the poster child of "stacking: not even once".
adam.
------ Original Message ------ From: "Bryde, Ole" Ole.Bryde@sonymobile.com To: "'Adam Armstrong'" adama@memetic.org; "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: 11/14/2014 12:17:17 AM Subject: RE: [Observium] Performance
Really ? How come ? Please elaborate on that.
Ole Bryde
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong Sent: den 13 november 2014 18:21 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Performance
Stacking switches is pretty naive.
adam.
------ Original Message ------ From: "Raphael Mazelier" raph@futomaki.net To: observium@observium.org Sent: 11/12/2014 4:09:49 AM Subject: Re: [Observium] Performance
Observium is great tool, have a nice gui, made plenty of things... But the poller is "naive".
For example I have a couple of stacked EX3300 I cannot poll with observium (the snmp is slow on this equipemnt ok).
Think about that : in observium the poll of this equipment take more than 5min (so it is unusable), in cacti with spine 20s.
Doing snmpbulwalk on all oid is not always the better solution....
Le 11/11/14 22:12, Spencer Gaw a écrit : >Oh great, this guy again... > >Regards, > >SG > >On 11/11/2014 1:58 PM, Alex Povolotsky wrote: >>I'm working on about 20 times better poller for Observium, >>current one is awful. Mysql should not be a bottleneck, I guess. >> _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium