The graphs look good.  The bps/pps graphs mirror each other.  I created a Port alert for ifInOctets_perc/ifOutOctets_perc with a 20 min wait for all my cisco devices a couple hours ago.  

Thanks!
-Chip
   


On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org> wrote:
In device -> ports, the table has bps/pps values. Also, are the graphs ok?

adam.



On 2014-01-20 16:31, Chip Pleasants wrote:
By HTMP tables, Do you mean, does the usage being reported
corresponded to the physical/logical interface usage?  We have other
tools doing the same job which I can compare against.  I'll take a
look around. 'll also take a look on the interface when the high usage
is occurring.

-Chip
 

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org> wrote:

It does seem that perhaps there is a 32/64bit counter issue, too, as the numerical values passed to the new and old alerting code are generated at the same points.

Are the values in the HTML tables showing correct values?

adam.

On 2014-01-20 15:53, Chip Pleasants wrote:

Ah.  Sorry.  Creating ones in the new system now.  

-Chip

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org> wrote:

That's the old alerting stuff, use the new stuff, it's less broken!

I recognise your name, so I'm pretty sure you're a subscriber :)

adam.

On 2014-01-20 10:42, Chip Pleasants wrote:

Is there a way to see all Ports that have been disabled for altering? 

I enabled email alerts in config.php for port percentage, but seeing
some odd behavior with the percentage portion with the physical
interfaces inside a etherchannel interface.  Below are a couple emails
I received.  The bandwidth mentioned in the email is more than the
physical interface. Is there another option I need to turn on or off
to account for this behavior?  Any suggestions are appreciated.

This physical interface didn't go over 444M. The port channel have 8
physical link in it.

Port saturation threshold alarm: cisco.switch.com [1] [1] [1] on GigabitEthernet3/1


Rates:1.63Gbps/11.6kbps(163/0) >85% of 1Gbps 

Another email

This physical interface hit a 1G. The port channel has 2 physical links in it.

Port saturation threshold alarm: cisco.switch.com [1] [1] [1] on GigabitEthernet2/25


Rates:147Mbps/6.62Gbps(15/662) >85% of 1Gbps

added to config.php

$config['alerts']['port_util_alert'] = TRUE; 
$config['alerts']['port_util_perc'] = 85;

Thanks,
Chip

Links:
------
[1] http://cisco.switch.com [1] [1]


_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [2] [2]


_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [2] [2]

Links:
------
[1] http://cisco.switch.com [1]
[2] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [2]


_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [2]

_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [2]



Links:
------
[1] http://cisco.switch.com
[2] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium