I've been meaning to ask the same thing, for two reasons. One is just due to typical abbreviations, such as "m" for milli, and "M" for mega, the other is because for us the error graphs appear way off, even though other graphs are not. We might have 100,000 absolute errors on a port, but the error graph will read about "15m". I find the difference in the absolute versus graphed numbers confusing. Perhaps it's an averaged amount over the sample period? If so, can we get actual numbers?
Part of the problem might be the only ports we have with errors are Brocade ports; our Cisco ports don't typically accumulate errors. Perhaps the Brocade error counters are atypical, even though "good" traffic counters are correct.
On 01/23/17 08:11 PM, Satish Patel wrote:
any suggestion?
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Satish Patel satish.txt@gmail.com wrote:
In Interface Error and Discard graph what is stand for "m" i have seen value like 100m so what does that mean, i can understand "1k" mean 1000 but does "m" means million?