Adam
Yes we have a delay of 30 minutes however when a single core is busy for a period on a task we get alerts however overall the servers usage may be less than 10%.
Maybe aggregate cpu and then alert of this?
-------- Original message -------- From: Adam Armstrong Date:01/09/2015 18:56 (GMT+10:00) To: observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] Multiple CPU
We return an "average" fake-cpu on unix systems. This might be useful to extend to others, but there is the issue that on some device types it might be difficult to distinguish between cores used for control plane and cores used for data plane.
Also, you should definitely have a delay set for processor usage.
adam.
Sent from Mailbirdhttp://www.getmailbird.com/?utm_source=Mailbird&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=sent-from-mailbird
On 01/09/2015 09:52:10, Cameron Murray cameron@techpath.com.au wrote:
Adam,
The silence is painful. At the moment we've had to disable cpu alerts.
-------- Original message -------- From: Ben Hohnke Date:01/09/2015 11:03 (GMT+10:00) To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Multiple CPU
I'm interested in this also, as we have the same issue with our multi-core routers from Mikrotik
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:58 AM Cameron Murray <cameron@techpath.com.aumailto:cameron@techpath.com.au> wrote: Guys,
I have checked the guides however Not seeing how to configure CPU alerting based on multiple CORE CPU's.
We have quite a number of windows virtual machines with 2 - 16+ cores and currently use "processor_usage greater 65" however this is alerting when a single core reaches >65%
What is the best way to manage this?
Regards,
Cameron Murray _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium