But of course you should only really be alerting on the "average" pseudo entity... :D
adam.
On 2018-02-11 11:54:08, Tom Laermans <tom.laermans@powersource.cx> wrote:
So why not exclude the VMs from the CPU
alerting checker's device or entity match? ;-)
I guess it also depends on the virtualization tech used (if you
can't distinguish by hostname), but for example many of my VMs
have "QEMU Virtual version 1.0" as description for the CPU, which
I could exclude.
Tom
On 2/10/2018 11:25 AM, Simon Mousey Smith wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar issue at the moment with
notifications for High CPU usage
We monitor a VM which has high CPU, but we also
monitor the VM host machine which has high CPU because of that
VM
And im getting double notifications for the high CPU
usage
It would be handy to say dont send alerts for high
cpu usage for the VM as the host machine will send the alerts
for high cpu usage
Regards
Simon
Hi
I Have a Question, I was looking in the
documentation for something that can help me, but
maybe I don't search with the correct words, there
is a way to make something similar to that I Put in
the image attach?
If One Switch goes down.. The other
switches behind it, don’t send alerts?
<image007.png>
|
Hermes J.
Martinez
|
|
ASISTENTE
DE SISTEMAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you really
need to print this e-mail?
En realidad necesita imprimir este correo?
Aviso Legal /
Legal Notice
http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium