It hit a test box we had.  11.4R8.4 has been safe to date on an MX80 in the lab

Alex


Typographical errors courtesy of iPhone

On Oct 11, 2013, at 21:13, "Adam Armstrong" <adama@memetic.org> wrote:

> On 2013-10-12 01:39, Steve Rossen wrote:
>> Is anyone else using Observium on the Juniper MX80 platform? I know
>> the MX960 is listed as supported but not the smaller one and we are
>> seeing an odd memory issue that lines up perfectly with when we
>> started polling it with Observium. Attached/linked image shows the
>> last 12 months of memory usage on a MX5. Not sure if it is related to
>> Observium or not so reaching out to see if other are seeing a similar
>> slow memory climb or not.
>> http://i.imgur.com/9PET5L3.png [1]
>
> Yes, this is a Juniper bug. It'll keep climbing and then reboot.
>
> One day vendors will get their shit together.
>
> This is /probably/ related to the mac accounting module. The last time I saw this on J kit it was a memory leak in whatever crack-addled code is involved in JUNIPER-MAC-MIB.
>
> adam.
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium