The original development of this feature was done on 7600 (identical to the 6500, but running "router" IOS train).
I assume if it isn't working on 6500s, it's due to Cisco not bother to correctly implement things on the "switch" IOS train. I'm not sure if this is likely the case on the Sup2T, though.
I currently don't have any ability to test this, and there is no development going in to the VRF and Pseudowire tracking code at the moment, so I'd consider those both dead or unsupported until we get a chance to rewrite them.
The existing code was just a quick hack required for a previous employer, so it's not really of very good quality in any case.
adam.
On 2013-05-02 17:17, Darius Seroka wrote:
Well then good to know its expected behavior :) Its running with a sup2t if it matters. Cheers Adam.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
6500? Why, that's a switch! No need for qa'd vrf snmp support there!
Muwhahaha.
Darius Seroka dariusjs@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
Has anyone got a Cisco 6500 series on observium with VRF's? I've recently been adding some cisco gear to observium and the vrf's don't get picked up. It did pick up VRF's from the pair of ASR1002
-- Regards, Darius _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [1]
Links:
[1] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium