A new request with request id 398 has been created by observium-request. Short info on the request is :

Title : observium Digest, Vol 84, Issue 2
Category :
Description : Send observium mailing list submissions to
    observium@observium.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    observium-request@observium.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
    observium-owner@observium.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of observium digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: observium Digest, Vol 84, Issue 1 (张来)
2. Re: observium Digest, Vol 84, Issue 1 (Simon Schmitz)
3. Re: observium Digest, Vol 84, Issue 1 (Adam Armstrong)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 20:41:07 +0800
From: 张来
To: observium@observium.org
Subject: Re: [Observium] observium Digest, Vol 84, Issue 1
Message-ID: <01DE546F-4D69-4E2A-9AAB-1707A3ED28FF@stacksnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=utf-8

hello！I am ob user. I think I lost my observium svn username and password.

Can you help me to set my usernane and password as

username：yuri
password：Ad2003@0407

Thank you！

发自我的 iPhone

> 在 2017年7月1日，19:00，observium-request@observium.org 写道：
>
> Send observium mailing list submissions to
> observium@observium.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> observium-request@observium.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> observium-owner@observium.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of observium digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Alert Checkers (Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA)
> 2. Re: Alert Checkers (Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA)
> 3. Re: Alert Checkers (Adam Armstrong)
> 4. Re: Alert Checkers (Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA)
> 5. Re: python-wrapper loop? (John Klasa)
> 6. Re: Alert Checkers (Thomas Nicholson)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:07:11 +0000
> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
> To: Observium
> Cc: observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello Experts,
>
> Quick one,
>
> I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section.
>
> I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices.
>
> But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ???
>
> Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts.
>
> For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section:
>
> [cid:image001.png@01D2F1BF.1E7B2480]
>
> So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ?
>
> Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ??
>
> PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM
> To: Observium
> Cc: observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling.
> How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo
> Adam.
> Sent from BlueMail
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
> Hello Experts,
>
>
> I See there 2 settings for ports on the device:
>
>
> [cid:image002.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>
>
> My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ??
>
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Stef Renders
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM
> To: Observium; observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
>
> Small remark,
>
>
> Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything.
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
> Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09
> To: Observium >; Observium >; observium >
> Cc: observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
>
> Thank you Simon,
>
>
> It worked after rebuild:
>
>
> [cid:image003.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>
>
> I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers.
>
>
> Anyways Thanks guys ☺ very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers
>
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM
> To: Observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'?
>
>
> Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!?
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Simon
>
>
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>
>
> Adam,
>
> I am seeing some assistance here.
>
> Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN”
>
> If I put a condition as
>
> ifOperStatus equals up
> ifAdminStatus equals up
>
> What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain.
>
> Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck.
>
> If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you:
>
> You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” :
>
>
>
> Look at my alert Check:
>
>
>
> Now tell me why no number count here.
>
> I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist.
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM
> To: observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert.
>
> It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense.
>
> Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples.
>
> adam.
> On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
> Example in the documentation:
>
> Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing
>
> Regards
> kaustubh
> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM
> To: 'Observium'
> Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium@observium.org'
> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> Hi Team,
>
> TO add on the below,
>
> I have referred to the documentation section,
>
>
> The settings I have:
>
>
>
> The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ?
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM
> To: observium@observium.org
> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium@observium.org
> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> HI Team,
>
> Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ?
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM
> To: observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers.
>
> Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format.
>
> Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense.
>
> You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again.
>
> Thanks,
> adam.
> On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
> Thank you for the Response Adam,
>
> Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing.
>
>
> If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers.
>
> Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ?
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM
> To: Observium
> Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium
>
> Hi,
> This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do.
> Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data!
> Thanks,
> Adam.
> Sent from BlueMail
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list.
>
> Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details:
>
>
> I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results.
>
> I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high.
>
> If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot.
>
> Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ?
>
> Thank you and Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>
> ________________________________
>
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>
>
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>
> ________________________________
>
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 38143 bytes
> Desc: image001.png
> URL:
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:52:02 +0000
> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
> To: Observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> Can someone please assist
>
>
> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
> ________________________________
> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
> Sent: Jun 30, 2017 4:41 PM
> To: Observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
> Cc: observium
>
> Hello Experts,
>
> Quick one,
>
> I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section.
>
> I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices.
>
> But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ???
>
> Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts.
>
> For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section:
>
> [cid:image001.png@01D2F1BF.1E7B2480]
>
> So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ?
>
> Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ??
>
> PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM
> To: Observium
> Cc: observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling.
> How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo
> Adam.
> Sent from BlueMail
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
> Hello Experts,
>
>
> I See there 2 settings for ports on the device:
>
>
> [cid:image002.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>
>
> My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ??
>
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Stef Renders
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM
> To: Observium; observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
>
> Small remark,
>
>
> Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything.
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
> Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09
> To: Observium >; Observium >; observium >
> Cc: observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
>
> Thank you Simon,
>
>
> It worked after rebuild:
>
>
> [cid:image003.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>
>
> I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers.
>
>
> Anyways Thanks guys :) very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers
>
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM
> To: Observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'?
>
>
> Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!?
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Simon
>
>
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>
>
> Adam,
>
> I am seeing some assistance here.
>
> Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN”
>
> If I put a condition as
>
> ifOperStatus equals up
> ifAdminStatus equals up
>
> What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain.
>
> Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck.
>
> If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you:
>
> You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” :
>
>
>
> Look at my alert Check:
>
>
>
> Now tell me why no number count here.
>
> I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist.
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM
> To: observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert.
>
> It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense.
>
> Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples.
>
> adam.
> On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
> Example in the documentation:
>
> Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing
>
> Regards
> kaustubh
> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM
> To: 'Observium'
> Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium@observium.org'
> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> Hi Team,
>
> TO add on the below,
>
> I have referred to the documentation section,
>
>
> The settings I have:
>
>
>
> The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ?
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM
> To: observium@observium.org
> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium@observium.org
> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> HI Team,
>
> Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ?
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM
> To: observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers.
>
> Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format.
>
> Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense.
>
> You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again.
>
> Thanks,
> adam.
> On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
> Thank you for the Response Adam,
>
> Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing.
>
>
> If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers.
>
> Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ?
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM
> To: Observium
> Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium
>
> Hi,
> This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do.
> Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data!
> Thanks,
> Adam.
> Sent from BlueMail
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list.
>
> Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details:
>
>
> I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results.
>
> I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high.
>
> If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot.
>
> Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ?
>
> Thank you and Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>
> ________________________________
>
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>
>
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>
> ________________________________
>
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 38143 bytes
> Desc: image001.png
> URL:
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:00:08 +0100
> From: "Adam Armstrong"
> To: ""
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Do not spam the mailing list with repeated demands for help if people don't immediately reply to you, or you will be removed.
>
> adam.
> On 30/06/2017 15:53:32, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
> Can someone please assist
>
>
> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
> Sent: Jun 30, 2017 4:41 PM
> To: Observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
> Cc: observium
>
>
> Hello Experts,
>
> Quick one,
>
> I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section.
>
> I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices.
>
> But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ???
>
> Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts.
>
> For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section:
>
>
> So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ?
>
> Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ??
>
> PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM
> To: Observium
> Cc: observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling.
> How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo
> Adam.
> Sent from BlueMail [http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9856]
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" wrote:
> Hello Experts,
>
> I See there 2 settings for ports on the device:
>
>
> My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ??
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Stef Renders
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM
> To: Observium; observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> Small remark,
>
> Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything.
>
> Kind regards
>
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
> Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09
> To: Observium ; Observium ; observium
> Cc: observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> Thank you Simon,
>
> It worked after rebuild:
>
>
> I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers.
>
> Anyways Thanks guys J very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM
> To: Observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> Hi,
>
> Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'?
>
> Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!?
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
>
> Adam,
>
> I am seeing some assistance here.
>
> Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN”
>
> If I put a condition as
>
> ifOperStatus equals up
> ifAdminStatus equals up
>
> What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain.
>
> Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck.
>
> If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you:
>
> You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” :
>
>
>
> Look at my alert Check:
>
>
>
> Now tell me why no number count here.
>
> I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist.
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM
> To: observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert.
>
> It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense.
>
> Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples.
>
> adam.
> On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
> Example in the documentation:
>
> Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing
>
> Regards
> kaustubh
> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM
> To: 'Observium'
> Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]'
> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> Hi Team,
>
> TO add on the below,
>
> I have referred to the documentation section,
>
>
> The settings I have:
>
>
>
> The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ?
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM
> To: observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> HI Team,
>
> Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ?
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM
> To: observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers.
>
> Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format.
>
> Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense.
>
> You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again.
>
> Thanks,
> adam.
> On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
> Thank you for the Response Adam,
>
> Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing.
>
>
> If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers.
>
> Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ?
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM
> To: Observium
> Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium
>
> Hi,
> This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do.
> Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data!
> Thanks,
> Adam.
> Sent from BlueMail [http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9856]
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list.
>
> Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details:
>
>
> I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results.
>
> I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high.
>
> If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot.
>
> Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ?
>
> Thank you and Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:05:22 +0000
> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
> To: Observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> Hello Adam,
>
> I am not spamming the mail box
>
> We are doing a POC in our environment and we neeed to give feed back to our management on this. Hence the mail. I do not think i am asking for updates every 2 mins. I am not here for instant help. I am also a user, who is researching on the tool So Cheers.
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
>
> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
> ________________________________
> From: Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Jun 30, 2017 8:30 PM
> To: observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> Do not spam the mailing list with repeated demands for help if people don't immediately reply to you, or you will be removed.
>
> adam.
>
> On 30/06/2017 15:53:32, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
>
> Can someone please assist
>
>
> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
> ________________________________
> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
> Sent: Jun 30, 2017 4:41 PM
> To: Observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
> Cc: observium
>
> Hello Experts,
>
> Quick one,
>
> I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section.
>
> I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices.
>
> But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ???
>
> Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts.
>
> For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section:
>
> [cid:image001.png@01D2F1BF.1E7B2480]
>
> So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ?
>
> Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ??
>
> PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM
> To: Observium
> Cc: observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling.
> How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo
> Adam.
> Sent from BlueMail
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
> Hello Experts,
>
>
> I See there 2 settings for ports on the device:
>
>
> [cid:image002.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>
>
> My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ??
>
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Stef Renders
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM
> To: Observium; observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
>
> Small remark,
>
>
> Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything.
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
> Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09
> To: Observium >; Observium >; observium >
> Cc: observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
>
> Thank you Simon,
>
>
> It worked after rebuild:
>
>
> [cid:image003.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>
>
> I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers.
>
>
> Anyways Thanks guys :) very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers
>
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM
> To: Observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'?
>
>
> Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!?
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Simon
>
>
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>
>
> Adam,
>
> I am seeing some assistance here.
>
> Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN”
>
> If I put a condition as
>
> ifOperStatus equals up
> ifAdminStatus equals up
>
> What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain.
>
> Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck.
>
> If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you:
>
> You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” :
>
>
>
> Look at my alert Check:
>
>
>
> Now tell me why no number count here.
>
> I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist.
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM
> To: observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert.
>
> It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense.
>
> Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples.
>
> adam.
> On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
> Example in the documentation:
>
> Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing
>
> Regards
> kaustubh
> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM
> To: 'Observium'
> Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium@observium.org'
> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> Hi Team,
>
> TO add on the below,
>
> I have referred to the documentation section,
>
>
> The settings I have:
>
>
>
> The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ?
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM
> To: observium@observium.org
> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium@observium.org
> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> HI Team,
>
> Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ?
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM
> To: observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>
> This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers.
>
> Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format.
>
> Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense.
>
> You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again.
>
> Thanks,
> adam.
> On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
> Thank you for the Response Adam,
>
> Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing.
>
>
> If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers.
>
> Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ?
>
> Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM
> To: Observium
> Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium
>
> Hi,
> This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do.
> Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data!
> Thanks,
> Adam.
> Sent from BlueMail
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list.
>
> Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details:
>
>
> I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results.
>
> I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high.
>
> If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot.
>
> Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ?
>
> Thank you and Regards
> Kaustubh
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>
> ________________________________
>
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>
>
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>
> ________________________________
>
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:51:18 +0000
> From: John Klasa
> To: Observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] python-wrapper loop?
> Message-ID:
>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Markus, thanks for your input. However the system went from 0.16.X -> 0.17.5.X and is behaving badly. It might be as you say but before I upgrade PHP any more ideas?
> System have 39 devices to poll. Have four CPUs and 6Gb RAM. It starts to behave badly directly from the beginning when enabling the CRON job.
>
> Regards
> __________________________________________________
> John Klasa
> Managed Services • Itiviti
> Senior Network Administrator
>
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Markus Klock
> Sent: den 30 juni 2017 01:55
> To: Observium
> Subject: Re: [Observium] python-wrapper loop?
>
> My guess is that your system is not fast enough to poll all your devices in 5min, creating new poller processes before the old ones are done.
> You should start by upgrading your PHP to version 7 as this is much faster, if the problem still persists then post a screenshot of the /pollerlog-page in the Observium GUI please.
>
> /Markus
>
> 2017-06-29 19:48 GMT+02:00 John Klasa >:
> Hi I’ve upgraded to this version:
> ./discovery.php -V
> Observium 17.5.8580
>
> It seemed to be a great update but then MySQL died and I found this in the logs:
>
> [2017/06/29 15:05:20 +0200] poller-wrapper.py(29309): /opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py: URGENT: poller-wrapper not started because already running 34 processes, load average (5min) 37.17
>
> And it kept increasing upton load over 70 where I killed all python, CROND and for some reason A LOT of ps processes. An example of processes below.
>
> 26133 ? D 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 23434
> 26331 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 2981
> 26354 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 10439
> 26355 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 11755
> 26356 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 5772
> 26357 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 2624
> 26360 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 19699
>
> 846 purify 20 0 342884 70760 1636 S 1.0 1.9 0:33.02 python
> 4424 purify 20 0 354536 11156 1632 S 1.0 0.3 1:27.40 python
> 4739 purify 20 0 356676 11832 1632 S 1.0 0.3 1:36.27 python
> 9718 purify 20 0 349728 10108 1636 S 1.0 0.3 1:03.00 python
> 20551 purify 20 0 361020 12280 1632 S 1.0 0.3 2:01.39 python
> 31260 purify 20 0 348144 76392 1636 S 1.0 2.0 0:56.62 python
> 402 purify 20 0 345244 33752 1636 S 0.7 0.9 0:43.67 python
> 1315 purify 20 0 343148 59904 1632 S 0.7 1.6 0:35.71 python
> 3219 purify 20 0 341844 47340 1632 S 0.7 1.3 0:28.92 python
> 3298 purify 20 0 353204 11376 1632 S 0.7 0.3 1:19.76 python
>
> Anyone know whats going on? I see this when I try to run the debug output
>
> Your PHP version is too old (5.4.16), |
> | functionality may be broken. Please update your PHP! |
> | Currently recommended version(s): 7.0.x or 5.6.x
>
> I guess I should upgrade PHP first.
>
> Regards
>
> -John
>
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:33:22 +0100
> From: Thomas Nicholson
> To: observium@observium.org
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
> Message-ID: <7caadd6e-d317-55e2-9cc2-c6adfd140907@thebunker.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of observium Digest, Vol 84, Issue 1
> ***********************





------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 15:18:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Simon Schmitz
To: Observium
Subject: Re: [Observium] observium Digest, Vol 84, Issue 1
Message-ID: <40E03E22-5BE9-4F04-89E6-87F5A65A864C@eseven.de>
Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=utf-8

You Kidding ? You send it to a open mailinglist !!!

> Am 01.07.2017 um 15:49 schrieb 张来 :
>
> hello！I am ob user. I think I lost my observium svn username and password.
>
> Can you help me to set my usernane and password as
>
> username：yuri
> password：Ad2003@0407
>
> Thank you！
>
> 发自我的 iPhone
>
>> 在 2017年7月1日，19:00，observium-request@observium.org 写道：
>>
>> Send observium mailing list submissions to
>> observium@observium.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> observium-request@observium.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> observium-owner@observium.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of observium digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Alert Checkers (Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA)
>> 2. Re: Alert Checkers (Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA)
>> 3. Re: Alert Checkers (Adam Armstrong)
>> 4. Re: Alert Checkers (Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA)
>> 5. Re: python-wrapper loop? (John Klasa)
>> 6. Re: Alert Checkers (Thomas Nicholson)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:07:11 +0000
>> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> Quick one,
>>
>> I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section.
>>
>> I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices.
>>
>> But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ???
>>
>> Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts.
>>
>> For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section:
>>
>> [cid:image001.png@01D2F1BF.1E7B2480]
>>
>> So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ?
>>
>> Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ??
>>
>> PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling.
>> How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>>
>> I See there 2 settings for ports on the device:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image002.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>>
>>
>> My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ??
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Stef Renders
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM
>> To: Observium; observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Small remark,
>>
>>
>> Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09
>> To: Observium >; Observium >; observium >
>> Cc: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Thank you Simon,
>>
>>
>> It worked after rebuild:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image003.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>>
>>
>> I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers.
>>
>>
>> Anyways Thanks guys ☺ very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'?
>>
>>
>> Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>>
>>
>> Adam,
>>
>> I am seeing some assistance here.
>>
>> Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN”
>>
>> If I put a condition as
>>
>> ifOperStatus equals up
>> ifAdminStatus equals up
>>
>> What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain.
>>
>> Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck.
>>
>> If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you:
>>
>> You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” :
>>
>>
>>
>> Look at my alert Check:
>>
>>
>>
>> Now tell me why no number count here.
>>
>> I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist.
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert.
>>
>> It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense.
>>
>> Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples.
>>
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>> Example in the documentation:
>>
>> Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing
>>
>> Regards
>> kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM
>> To: 'Observium'
>> Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium@observium.org'
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> TO add on the below,
>>
>> I have referred to the documentation section,
>>
>>
>> The settings I have:
>>
>>
>>
>> The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium@observium.org
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> HI Team,
>>
>> Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers.
>>
>> Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format.
>>
>> Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense.
>>
>> You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>> Thank you for the Response Adam,
>>
>> Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing.
>>
>>
>> If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers.
>>
>> Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium
>>
>> Hi,
>> This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do.
>> Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data!
>> Thanks,
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list.
>>
>> Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details:
>>
>>
>> I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results.
>>
>> I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high.
>>
>> If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot.
>>
>> Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ?
>>
>> Thank you and Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>>
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: image001.png
>> Type: image/png
>> Size: 38143 bytes
>> Desc: image001.png
>> URL:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:52:02 +0000
>> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>> Can someone please assist
>>
>>
>> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
>> Sent: Jun 30, 2017 4:41 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Cc: observium
>>
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> Quick one,
>>
>> I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section.
>>
>> I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices.
>>
>> But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ???
>>
>> Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts.
>>
>> For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section:
>>
>> [cid:image001.png@01D2F1BF.1E7B2480]
>>
>> So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ?
>>
>> Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ??
>>
>> PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling.
>> How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>>
>> I See there 2 settings for ports on the device:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image002.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>>
>>
>> My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ??
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Stef Renders
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM
>> To: Observium; observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Small remark,
>>
>>
>> Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09
>> To: Observium >; Observium >; observium >
>> Cc: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Thank you Simon,
>>
>>
>> It worked after rebuild:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image003.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>>
>>
>> I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers.
>>
>>
>> Anyways Thanks guys :) very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'?
>>
>>
>> Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>>
>>
>> Adam,
>>
>> I am seeing some assistance here.
>>
>> Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN”
>>
>> If I put a condition as
>>
>> ifOperStatus equals up
>> ifAdminStatus equals up
>>
>> What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain.
>>
>> Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck.
>>
>> If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you:
>>
>> You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” :
>>
>>
>>
>> Look at my alert Check:
>>
>>
>>
>> Now tell me why no number count here.
>>
>> I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist.
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert.
>>
>> It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense.
>>
>> Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples.
>>
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>> Example in the documentation:
>>
>> Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing
>>
>> Regards
>> kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM
>> To: 'Observium'
>> Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium@observium.org'
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> TO add on the below,
>>
>> I have referred to the documentation section,
>>
>>
>> The settings I have:
>>
>>
>>
>> The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium@observium.org
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> HI Team,
>>
>> Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers.
>>
>> Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format.
>>
>> Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense.
>>
>> You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>> Thank you for the Response Adam,
>>
>> Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing.
>>
>>
>> If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers.
>>
>> Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium
>>
>> Hi,
>> This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do.
>> Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data!
>> Thanks,
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list.
>>
>> Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details:
>>
>>
>> I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results.
>>
>> I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high.
>>
>> If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot.
>>
>> Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ?
>>
>> Thank you and Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>>
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: image001.png
>> Type: image/png
>> Size: 38143 bytes
>> Desc: image001.png
>> URL:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:00:08 +0100
>> From: "Adam Armstrong"
>> To: ""
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Message-ID:
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Do not spam the mailing list with repeated demands for help if people don't immediately reply to you, or you will be removed.
>>
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 15:53:32, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
>> Can someone please assist
>>
>>
>> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
>> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
>> Sent: Jun 30, 2017 4:41 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Cc: observium
>>
>>
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> Quick one,
>>
>> I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section.
>>
>> I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices.
>>
>> But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ???
>>
>> Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts.
>>
>> For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section:
>>
>>
>> So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ?
>>
>> Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ??
>>
>> PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling.
>> How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail [http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9856]
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" wrote:
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> I See there 2 settings for ports on the device:
>>
>>
>> My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ??
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Stef Renders
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM
>> To: Observium; observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Small remark,
>>
>> Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09
>> To: Observium ; Observium ; observium
>> Cc: observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Thank you Simon,
>>
>> It worked after rebuild:
>>
>>
>> I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers.
>>
>> Anyways Thanks guys J very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'?
>>
>> Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
>>
>> Adam,
>>
>> I am seeing some assistance here.
>>
>> Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN”
>>
>> If I put a condition as
>>
>> ifOperStatus equals up
>> ifAdminStatus equals up
>>
>> What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain.
>>
>> Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck.
>>
>> If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you:
>>
>> You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” :
>>
>>
>>
>> Look at my alert Check:
>>
>>
>>
>> Now tell me why no number count here.
>>
>> I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist.
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert.
>>
>> It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense.
>>
>> Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples.
>>
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
>> Example in the documentation:
>>
>> Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing
>>
>> Regards
>> kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM
>> To: 'Observium'
>> Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]'
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> TO add on the below,
>>
>> I have referred to the documentation section,
>>
>>
>> The settings I have:
>>
>>
>>
>> The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> HI Team,
>>
>> Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers.
>>
>> Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format.
>>
>> Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense.
>>
>> You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
>> Thank you for the Response Adam,
>>
>> Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing.
>>
>>
>> If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers.
>>
>> Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium
>>
>> Hi,
>> This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do.
>> Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data!
>> Thanks,
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail [http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9856]
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list.
>>
>> Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details:
>>
>>
>> I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results.
>>
>> I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high.
>>
>> If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot.
>>
>> Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ?
>>
>> Thank you and Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:05:22 +0000
>> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>> Hello Adam,
>>
>> I am not spamming the mail box
>>
>> We are doing a POC in our environment and we neeed to give feed back to our management on this. Hence the mail. I do not think i am asking for updates every 2 mins. I am not here for instant help. I am also a user, who is researching on the tool So Cheers.
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
>> ________________________________
>> From: Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Jun 30, 2017 8:30 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Do not spam the mailing list with repeated demands for help if people don't immediately reply to you, or you will be removed.
>>
>> adam.
>>
>> On 30/06/2017 15:53:32, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
>>
>> Can someone please assist
>>
>>
>> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
>> Sent: Jun 30, 2017 4:41 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Cc: observium
>>
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> Quick one,
>>
>> I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section.
>>
>> I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices.
>>
>> But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ???
>>
>> Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts.
>>
>> For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section:
>>
>> [cid:image001.png@01D2F1BF.1E7B2480]
>>
>> So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ?
>>
>> Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ??
>>
>> PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling.
>> How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>>
>> I See there 2 settings for ports on the device:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image002.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>>
>>
>> My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ??
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Stef Renders
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM
>> To: Observium; observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Small remark,
>>
>>
>> Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09
>> To: Observium >; Observium >; observium >
>> Cc: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Thank you Simon,
>>
>>
>> It worked after rebuild:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image003.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>>
>>
>> I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers.
>>
>>
>> Anyways Thanks guys :) very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'?
>>
>>
>> Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>>
>>
>> Adam,
>>
>> I am seeing some assistance here.
>>
>> Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN”
>>
>> If I put a condition as
>>
>> ifOperStatus equals up
>> ifAdminStatus equals up
>>
>> What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain.
>>
>> Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck.
>>
>> If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you:
>>
>> You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” :
>>
>>
>>
>> Look at my alert Check:
>>
>>
>>
>> Now tell me why no number count here.
>>
>> I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist.
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert.
>>
>> It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense.
>>
>> Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples.
>>
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>> Example in the documentation:
>>
>> Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing
>>
>> Regards
>> kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM
>> To: 'Observium'
>> Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium@observium.org'
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> TO add on the below,
>>
>> I have referred to the documentation section,
>>
>>
>> The settings I have:
>>
>>
>>
>> The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium@observium.org
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> HI Team,
>>
>> Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers.
>>
>> Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format.
>>
>> Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense.
>>
>> You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>> Thank you for the Response Adam,
>>
>> Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing.
>>
>>
>> If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers.
>>
>> Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium
>>
>> Hi,
>> This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do.
>> Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data!
>> Thanks,
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list.
>>
>> Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details:
>>
>>
>> I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results.
>>
>> I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high.
>>
>> If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot.
>>
>> Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ?
>>
>> Thank you and Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>>
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:51:18 +0000
>> From: John Klasa
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] python-wrapper loop?
>> Message-ID:
>>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Markus, thanks for your input. However the system went from 0.16.X -> 0.17.5.X and is behaving badly. It might be as you say but before I upgrade PHP any more ideas?
>> System have 39 devices to poll. Have four CPUs and 6Gb RAM. It starts to behave badly directly from the beginning when enabling the CRON job.
>>
>> Regards
>> __________________________________________________
>> John Klasa
>> Managed Services • Itiviti
>> Senior Network Administrator
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Markus Klock
>> Sent: den 30 juni 2017 01:55
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] python-wrapper loop?
>>
>> My guess is that your system is not fast enough to poll all your devices in 5min, creating new poller processes before the old ones are done.
>> You should start by upgrading your PHP to version 7 as this is much faster, if the problem still persists then post a screenshot of the /pollerlog-page in the Observium GUI please.
>>
>> /Markus
>>
>> 2017-06-29 19:48 GMT+02:00 John Klasa >:
>> Hi I’ve upgraded to this version:
>> ./discovery.php -V
>> Observium 17.5.8580
>>
>> It seemed to be a great update but then MySQL died and I found this in the logs:
>>
>> [2017/06/29 15:05:20 +0200] poller-wrapper.py(29309): /opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py: URGENT: poller-wrapper not started because already running 34 processes, load average (5min) 37.17
>>
>> And it kept increasing upton load over 70 where I killed all python, CROND and for some reason A LOT of ps processes. An example of processes below.
>>
>> 26133 ? D 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 23434
>> 26331 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 2981
>> 26354 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 10439
>> 26355 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 11755
>> 26356 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 5772
>> 26357 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 2624
>> 26360 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 19699
>>
>> 846 purify 20 0 342884 70760 1636 S 1.0 1.9 0:33.02 python
>> 4424 purify 20 0 354536 11156 1632 S 1.0 0.3 1:27.40 python
>> 4739 purify 20 0 356676 11832 1632 S 1.0 0.3 1:36.27 python
>> 9718 purify 20 0 349728 10108 1636 S 1.0 0.3 1:03.00 python
>> 20551 purify 20 0 361020 12280 1632 S 1.0 0.3 2:01.39 python
>> 31260 purify 20 0 348144 76392 1636 S 1.0 2.0 0:56.62 python
>> 402 purify 20 0 345244 33752 1636 S 0.7 0.9 0:43.67 python
>> 1315 purify 20 0 343148 59904 1632 S 0.7 1.6 0:35.71 python
>> 3219 purify 20 0 341844 47340 1632 S 0.7 1.3 0:28.92 python
>> 3298 purify 20 0 353204 11376 1632 S 0.7 0.3 1:19.76 python
>>
>> Anyone know whats going on? I see this when I try to run the debug output
>>
>> Your PHP version is too old (5.4.16), |
>> | functionality may be broken. Please update your PHP! |
>> | Currently recommended version(s): 7.0.x or 5.6.x
>>
>> I guess I should upgrade PHP first.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> -John
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:33:22 +0100
>> From: Thomas Nicholson
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Message-ID: <7caadd6e-d317-55e2-9cc2-c6adfd140907@thebunker.net>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> End of observium Digest, Vol 84, Issue 1
>> ***********************
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 14:30:33 +0100
From: "Adam Armstrong"
To: ""
Subject: Re: [Observium] observium Digest, Vol 84, Issue 1
Message-ID: <036262cc-0800-4e46-8c3e-bbb54434ba65@getmailbird.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Don't worry. I didn't set that password :)

adam.
On 01/07/2017 14:19:02, Simon Schmitz wrote:
You Kidding ? You send it to a open mailinglist !!!

> Am 01.07.2017 um 15:49 schrieb 张来 :
>
> hello！I am ob user. I think I lost my observium svn username and password.
>
> Can you help me to set my usernane and password as
>
> username：yuri
> password：Ad2003@0407
>
> Thank you！
>
> 发自我的 iPhone
>
>> 在 2017年7月1日，19:00，observium-request@observium.org 写道：
>>
>> Send observium mailing list submissions to
>> observium@observium.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> observium-request@observium.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> observium-owner@observium.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of observium digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Alert Checkers (Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA)
>> 2. Re: Alert Checkers (Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA)
>> 3. Re: Alert Checkers (Adam Armstrong)
>> 4. Re: Alert Checkers (Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA)
>> 5. Re: python-wrapper loop? (John Klasa)
>> 6. Re: Alert Checkers (Thomas Nicholson)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:07:11 +0000
>> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> Quick one,
>>
>> I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section.
>>
>> I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices.
>>
>> But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ???
>>
>> Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts.
>>
>> For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section:
>>
>> [cid:image001.png@01D2F1BF.1E7B2480]
>>
>> So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ?
>>
>> Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ??
>>
>> PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling.
>> How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>>
>> I See there 2 settings for ports on the device:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image002.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>>
>>
>> My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ??
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Stef Renders
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM
>> To: Observium; observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Small remark,
>>
>>
>> Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09
>> To: Observium >; Observium >; observium >
>> Cc: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Thank you Simon,
>>
>>
>> It worked after rebuild:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image003.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>>
>>
>> I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers.
>>
>>
>> Anyways Thanks guys ☺ very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'?
>>
>>
>> Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>>
>>
>> Adam,
>>
>> I am seeing some assistance here.
>>
>> Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN”
>>
>> If I put a condition as
>>
>> ifOperStatus equals up
>> ifAdminStatus equals up
>>
>> What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain.
>>
>> Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck.
>>
>> If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you:
>>
>> You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” :
>>
>>
>>
>> Look at my alert Check:
>>
>>
>>
>> Now tell me why no number count here.
>>
>> I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist.
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert.
>>
>> It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense.
>>
>> Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples.
>>
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>> Example in the documentation:
>>
>> Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing
>>
>> Regards
>> kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM
>> To: 'Observium'
>> Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium@observium.org'
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> TO add on the below,
>>
>> I have referred to the documentation section,
>>
>>
>> The settings I have:
>>
>>
>>
>> The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium@observium.org
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> HI Team,
>>
>> Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers.
>>
>> Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format.
>>
>> Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense.
>>
>> You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>> Thank you for the Response Adam,
>>
>> Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing.
>>
>>
>> If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers.
>>
>> Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium
>>
>> Hi,
>> This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do.
>> Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data!
>> Thanks,
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list.
>>
>> Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details:
>>
>>
>> I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results.
>>
>> I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high.
>>
>> If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot.
>>
>> Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ?
>>
>> Thank you and Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>>
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: image001.png
>> Type: image/png
>> Size: 38143 bytes
>> Desc: image001.png
>> URL:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:52:02 +0000
>> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>> Can someone please assist
>>
>>
>> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
>> Sent: Jun 30, 2017 4:41 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Cc: observium
>>
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> Quick one,
>>
>> I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section.
>>
>> I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices.
>>
>> But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ???
>>
>> Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts.
>>
>> For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section:
>>
>> [cid:image001.png@01D2F1BF.1E7B2480]
>>
>> So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ?
>>
>> Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ??
>>
>> PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling.
>> How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>>
>> I See there 2 settings for ports on the device:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image002.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>>
>>
>> My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ??
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Stef Renders
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM
>> To: Observium; observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Small remark,
>>
>>
>> Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09
>> To: Observium >; Observium >; observium >
>> Cc: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Thank you Simon,
>>
>>
>> It worked after rebuild:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image003.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>>
>>
>> I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers.
>>
>>
>> Anyways Thanks guys :) very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'?
>>
>>
>> Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>>
>>
>> Adam,
>>
>> I am seeing some assistance here.
>>
>> Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN”
>>
>> If I put a condition as
>>
>> ifOperStatus equals up
>> ifAdminStatus equals up
>>
>> What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain.
>>
>> Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck.
>>
>> If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you:
>>
>> You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” :
>>
>>
>>
>> Look at my alert Check:
>>
>>
>>
>> Now tell me why no number count here.
>>
>> I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist.
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert.
>>
>> It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense.
>>
>> Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples.
>>
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>> Example in the documentation:
>>
>> Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing
>>
>> Regards
>> kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM
>> To: 'Observium'
>> Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium@observium.org'
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> TO add on the below,
>>
>> I have referred to the documentation section,
>>
>>
>> The settings I have:
>>
>>
>>
>> The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium@observium.org
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> HI Team,
>>
>> Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers.
>>
>> Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format.
>>
>> Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense.
>>
>> You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>> Thank you for the Response Adam,
>>
>> Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing.
>>
>>
>> If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers.
>>
>> Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium
>>
>> Hi,
>> This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do.
>> Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data!
>> Thanks,
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list.
>>
>> Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details:
>>
>>
>> I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results.
>>
>> I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high.
>>
>> If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot.
>>
>> Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ?
>>
>> Thank you and Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>>
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: image001.png
>> Type: image/png
>> Size: 38143 bytes
>> Desc: image001.png
>> URL:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:00:08 +0100
>> From: "Adam Armstrong"
>> To: ""
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Message-ID:
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Do not spam the mailing list with repeated demands for help if people don't immediately reply to you, or you will be removed.
>>
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 15:53:32, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
>> Can someone please assist
>>
>>
>> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
>> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
>> Sent: Jun 30, 2017 4:41 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Cc: observium
>>
>>
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> Quick one,
>>
>> I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section.
>>
>> I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices.
>>
>> But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ???
>>
>> Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts.
>>
>> For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section:
>>
>>
>> So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ?
>>
>> Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ??
>>
>> PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling.
>> How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail [http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9856]
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" wrote:
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> I See there 2 settings for ports on the device:
>>
>>
>> My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ??
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Stef Renders
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM
>> To: Observium; observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Small remark,
>>
>> Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09
>> To: Observium ; Observium ; observium
>> Cc: observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Thank you Simon,
>>
>> It worked after rebuild:
>>
>>
>> I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers.
>>
>> Anyways Thanks guys J very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'?
>>
>> Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
>>
>> Adam,
>>
>> I am seeing some assistance here.
>>
>> Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN”
>>
>> If I put a condition as
>>
>> ifOperStatus equals up
>> ifAdminStatus equals up
>>
>> What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain.
>>
>> Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck.
>>
>> If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you:
>>
>> You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” :
>>
>>
>>
>> Look at my alert Check:
>>
>>
>>
>> Now tell me why no number count here.
>>
>> I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist.
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert.
>>
>> It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense.
>>
>> Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples.
>>
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
>> Example in the documentation:
>>
>> Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing
>>
>> Regards
>> kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM
>> To: 'Observium'
>> Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]'
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> TO add on the below,
>>
>> I have referred to the documentation section,
>>
>>
>> The settings I have:
>>
>>
>>
>> The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> HI Team,
>>
>> Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers.
>>
>> Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format.
>>
>> Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense.
>>
>> You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
>> Thank you for the Response Adam,
>>
>> Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing.
>>
>>
>> If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers.
>>
>> Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium
>>
>> Hi,
>> This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do.
>> Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data!
>> Thanks,
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail [http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9856]
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list.
>>
>> Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details:
>>
>>
>> I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results.
>>
>> I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high.
>>
>> If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot.
>>
>> Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ?
>>
>> Thank you and Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html [https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html] or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:05:22 +0000
>> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>> Hello Adam,
>>
>> I am not spamming the mail box
>>
>> We are doing a POC in our environment and we neeed to give feed back to our management on this. Hence the mail. I do not think i am asking for updates every 2 mins. I am not here for instant help. I am also a user, who is researching on the tool So Cheers.
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
>> ________________________________
>> From: Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Jun 30, 2017 8:30 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Do not spam the mailing list with repeated demands for help if people don't immediately reply to you, or you will be removed.
>>
>> adam.
>>
>> On 30/06/2017 15:53:32, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA wrote:
>>
>> Can someone please assist
>>
>>
>> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA"
>> Sent: Jun 30, 2017 4:41 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Cc: observium
>>
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> Quick one,
>>
>> I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section.
>>
>> I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices.
>>
>> But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ???
>>
>> Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts.
>>
>> For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section:
>>
>> [cid:image001.png@01D2F1BF.1E7B2480]
>>
>> So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ?
>>
>> Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ??
>>
>> PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling.
>> How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>>
>> I See there 2 settings for ports on the device:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image002.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>>
>>
>> My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ??
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Stef Renders
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM
>> To: Observium; observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Small remark,
>>
>>
>> Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09
>> To: Observium >; Observium >; observium >
>> Cc: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Thank you Simon,
>>
>>
>> It worked after rebuild:
>>
>>
>> [cid:image003.png@01D2F1B6.82235060]
>>
>>
>> I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers.
>>
>>
>> Anyways Thanks guys :) very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'?
>>
>>
>> Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>>
>>
>> Adam,
>>
>> I am seeing some assistance here.
>>
>> Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN”
>>
>> If I put a condition as
>>
>> ifOperStatus equals up
>> ifAdminStatus equals up
>>
>> What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain.
>>
>> Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck.
>>
>> If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you:
>>
>> You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” :
>>
>>
>>
>> Look at my alert Check:
>>
>>
>>
>> Now tell me why no number count here.
>>
>> I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist.
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert.
>>
>> It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense.
>>
>> Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples.
>>
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>> Example in the documentation:
>>
>> Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing
>>
>> Regards
>> kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM
>> To: 'Observium'
>> Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium@observium.org'
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> TO add on the below,
>>
>> I have referred to the documentation section,
>>
>>
>> The settings I have:
>>
>>
>>
>> The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>> From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium@observium.org
>> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> HI Team,
>>
>> Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>>
>> This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers.
>>
>> Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format.
>>
>> Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense.
>>
>> You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> adam.
>> On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > wrote:
>> Thank you for the Response Adam,
>>
>> Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing.
>>
>>
>> If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers.
>>
>> Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong
>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM
>> To: Observium
>> Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium
>>
>> Hi,
>> This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do.
>> Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data!
>> Thanks,
>> Adam.
>> Sent from BlueMail
>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" > wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list.
>>
>> Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details:
>>
>>
>> I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results.
>>
>> I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high.
>>
>> If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot.
>>
>> Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ?
>>
>> Thank you and Regards
>> Kaustubh
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>>
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>>
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices.
>> These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.
>> CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:51:18 +0000
>> From: John Klasa
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] python-wrapper loop?
>> Message-ID:
>>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Markus, thanks for your input. However the system went from 0.16.X -> 0.17.5.X and is behaving badly. It might be as you say but before I upgrade PHP any more ideas?
>> System have 39 devices to poll. Have four CPUs and 6Gb RAM. It starts to behave badly directly from the beginning when enabling the CRON job.
>>
>> Regards
>> __________________________________________________
>> John Klasa
>> Managed Services • Itiviti
>> Senior Network Administrator
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Markus Klock
>> Sent: den 30 juni 2017 01:55
>> To: Observium
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] python-wrapper loop?
>>
>> My guess is that your system is not fast enough to poll all your devices in 5min, creating new poller processes before the old ones are done.
>> You should start by upgrading your PHP to version 7 as this is much faster, if the problem still persists then post a screenshot of the /pollerlog-page in the Observium GUI please.
>>
>> /Markus
>>
>> 2017-06-29 19:48 GMT+02:00 John Klasa >:
>> Hi I’ve upgraded to this version:
>> ./discovery.php -V
>> Observium 17.5.8580
>>
>> It seemed to be a great update but then MySQL died and I found this in the logs:
>>
>> [2017/06/29 15:05:20 +0200] poller-wrapper.py(29309): /opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py: URGENT: poller-wrapper not started because already running 34 processes, load average (5min) 37.17
>>
>> And it kept increasing upton load over 70 where I killed all python, CROND and for some reason A LOT of ps processes. An example of processes below.
>>
>> 26133 ? D 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 23434
>> 26331 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 2981
>> 26354 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 10439
>> 26355 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 11755
>> 26356 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 5772
>> 26357 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 2624
>> 26360 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 19699
>>
>> 846 purify 20 0 342884 70760 1636 S 1.0 1.9 0:33.02 python
>> 4424 purify 20 0 354536 11156 1632 S 1.0 0.3 1:27.40 python
>> 4739 purify 20 0 356676 11832 1632 S 1.0 0.3 1:36.27 python
>> 9718 purify 20 0 349728 10108 1636 S 1.0 0.3 1:03.00 python
>> 20551 purify 20 0 361020 12280 1632 S 1.0 0.3 2:01.39 python
>> 31260 purify 20 0 348144 76392 1636 S 1.0 2.0 0:56.62 python
>> 402 purify 20 0 345244 33752 1636 S 0.7 0.9 0:43.67 python
>> 1315 purify 20 0 343148 59904 1632 S 0.7 1.6 0:35.71 python
>> 3219 purify 20 0 341844 47340 1632 S 0.7 1.3 0:28.92 python
>> 3298 purify 20 0 353204 11376 1632 S 0.7 0.3 1:19.76 python
>>
>> Anyone know whats going on? I see this when I try to run the debug output
>>
>> Your PHP version is too old (5.4.16), |
>> | functionality may be broken. Please update your PHP! |
>> | Currently recommended version(s): 7.0.x or 5.6.x
>>
>> I guess I should upgrade PHP first.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> -John
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:33:22 +0100
>> From: Thomas Nicholson
>> To: observium@observium.org
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
>> Message-ID:
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> End of observium Digest, Vol 84, Issue 1
>> ***********************
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium


------------------------------

End of observium Digest, Vol 84, Issue 2
****************************************

Click for details : http://Wron:8080/WorkOrder.do?woMode=viewWO&woID=398

NOTE: You are receiving this mail because, the Requester/Technician wanted you to get notified on this request creation.