Hi Aaron,I'm looking at ways of trying to alleviate these sorts of problems. One possiblity is moving some of the things we currently collect in the poller to another, less frequently run, process for instances like this. Things like Duplex, MTU, ifAlias, etc.
A major rewrite of the ports poller is somewhere on the horizon, I think.
adam._______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observiumOn 09/09/2015 18:12:46, Aaron Finney <aaron.finney@openx.com> wrote:
Hello all,Moving forward with our POC, and almost everything is perfect...the one thing that's still nagging us is the long polling times for our Juniper switch stacks. Our newest QFX 5k 96s 2-member stacks are now down under 300 seconds after upping max-requests to 70 (~230 seconds now), but our older EX stacks are still taking longer than the polling interval (~330 seconds) to complete.I realize it's the length of time that the Junipers take to handle the snmpbulkwalk of IfEntry and IfEntryX, but has anyone come up with a workaround to date? Obviously stripping OIDs out of the standard MIBs is not a solution because it could break other devices, but is there a possibility I could create an "IfEntry-lite" version that would be exclusive to the EX platform? Or even a custom poller that uses JunoScript instead of snmp? I'm looking for any reasonable solution, even if it takes some work to implement.Thanks!Aaron
--Aaron Finney | Network Engineer
888 East Walnut Street, 2nd Floor | Pasadena, CA 91101office: +1 (626) 466-1141 x6035Watch how we make online advertising simple: http://bit.ly/Ent_vid
www.openx.com | follow us on: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium