imo, 1920 will be common for quite a while yet.any chance you can make the scaling formulaic, based on a config parameter?
that way you only have to do it once, forever.
(bonus: mbp folks are happy, you can be lazy when 8k shows up, etc…)
R.
Hi All,
Are any of you running 4k displays yet?
We've been thinking about how to handle larger displays and were
considering jumping straight from the existing 1280px wide to 3840px
rather than building a 'widescreen' mode on 1920px.
I think it would be most noticeable in the amount and resolution of the
graphs we could display. We could effectively fit twice the amount of
data into each graph. It would probably require quite a lot of work, so
it's important we get the resolution correct!
(no, i don't care about your macbook pro's silly resolution)
adam.