Hi Rhian,
First off, please don't hijack threads - this has nothing to do with mod_auth_kerb.
Second, yes, you need an snmpd supporting the high capacity storage tables. Net-SNMP supports this from 5.7 on, if you don't disable if via compile options, so an upgrade might be in order.
Tom
On 13/12/2015 14:41, Rhian Resnick wrote:
Good morning,
We recently noticed that SNMP is having difficulty handling large file sysystem. We have a 120TB XFS system that is reporting on 4.4TB and alerting because SNMP is reporting the wrong values.
snmpwalk -mALL -v2c -{COM} {HOST} hrStorageTable | grep 40 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageIndex.40 = INTEGER: 40 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.40 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageFixedDisk HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageDescr.40 = STRING: /home HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageAllocationUnits.40 = INTEGER: 4096 Bytes HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageSize.40 = INTEGER: 1186465536 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageUsed.40 = INTEGER: 1036605829 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageUsed.44 = INTEGER: 666446640
Some forums have indicated this can be resolved by upgrading to 64 bit integers but I am not an SNMP expert.
Has anyone seen this behavior and if so how do we work around it? In the HPC world this is a small name space so I worry about monitoring storage on our Lustre FS.
Thanks
Rhian Resnick
Assistant Director Middleware and HPC
Office of Information Technology
Florida Atlantic University
777 Glades Road, CM22, Rm 218
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Phone 561.297.2647
Fax 561.297.0222
image https://hpc.fau.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/image.jpg
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium