Woah, even I didn't know about that =)

For associations, adding a new association is a logical OR, btw. Adding multiple conditions inside one association is AND.

When adding a checker you can only add the first association; but there's an "Add" button in the checker interface to add more.

Tom

On 2015-12-10 11:03, Markus Klock wrote:

You can use the (undocumented) condition "list" or "in".

[Entity Match]

bgpPeerRemoteAs list 174,3356,2914,5580

You can use the (undocumented) condition list.

/Markus

2015-12-10 10:37 GMT+01:00 Robert Williams <Robert@custodiandc.com>:

Hi,

What’s the correct syntax for an entity match which will match a selection of ASNs? I need an alert checker which will look for a specific set of ASNs and alert for any BGP session being not-up.

Currently for our iBGP we use:

[Conditions]

bgpPeerState ne established

bgpPeerAdminStatus notequals stop

[Device]

*

[Entity Match]

bgpPeerRemoteAs match <ourASN>

This works perfectly.

Now – what I’m after is that I need a new checker which will match eBGP ASNs like 174,3356,2914,5580 etc. all in one rule (the ‘important’ ASNs, for want of a better term).

I have tried a selection of things but I’m obviously missing what the logical ‘or’ element should be in this case, as all my attempts at using multiple ASNs within a match just result in zero matches.

Can someone point me in the right direction please? Cheers!

Robert Williams
Custodian Data Centre
Email: Robert@CustodianDC.com
http://www.CustodianDC.com

_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium