-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
From: "John Brown" <john@citylinkfiber.com>
To: "Observium Network Observation System" <observium@observium.org>
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 7:23:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Observium] WiFi support progress
for true WiFI with the user / client being mobile, yes PIA.
For wireless that may use the WiFI protocol or some abortion of it,
the clients are generally fixed in location and the AP they talk to,
ergo the WISP market
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org> wrote:
> Adding this stuff involves a lot of work, its jot just the case of new
> graphs but multiple interconnected entity types.
>
> I'm not sure how to do clients, it seems quite heavy to graph, and it seems
> we're going to have the possibility of clients crossing APs, radios and
> controllers, which is going to get super complicated.
>
> Adam.
>
> Sent with AquaMail for Android
> http://www.aqua-mail.com
>
> On 1 March 2015 21:46:24 "Ron Marosko" <ron@rjr-services.com> wrote:
>>
>> This would be generally correct… for broadband fixed wireless (Canopy,
>> UBNT, et al.), having a graph of the client device RSSI/SNR value is helpful
>> when it comes to troubleshooting client connectivity issues when something
>> changes over time.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ve started playing a little with this on the Canopy side of things, have
>> identified the appropriate SNMP OIDs to poll/graph, but I don’t know how to
>> manipulate the graph/database stuff to get the graphs to show up neatly.
>> What I’ve got is really messy and not viable.
>>
>>
>>
>> …Ron
>>
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of
>> Eduardo Schoedler
>> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 8:59 PM
>> To: Observium Network Observation System
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] WiFi support progress
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-03-01 17:43 GMT-03:00 Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org>:
>>
>> How usable is it?
>>
>>
>>
>> For an WISP? I think it's good to have client's CCQ, for example.
>>
>> Client's signal its good too.
>>
>>
>>
>> And that's all, folks. :)
>>
>>
>>
>> But IMHO it's a waste of time, since there is Aircontrol from Ubnt and
>> does all you need, including manage this devices.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Eduardo Schoedler
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
To: "Observium Network Observation System" <observium@observium.org>
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 7:23:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Observium] WiFi support progress
for true WiFI with the user / client being mobile, yes PIA.
For wireless that may use the WiFI protocol or some abortion of it,
the clients are generally fixed in location and the AP they talk to,
ergo the WISP market
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org> wrote:
> Adding this stuff involves a lot of work, its jot just the case of new
> graphs but multiple interconnected entity types.
>
> I'm not sure how to do clients, it seems quite heavy to graph, and it seems
> we're going to have the possibility of clients crossing APs, radios and
> controllers, which is going to get super complicated.
>
> Adam.
>
> Sent with AquaMail for Android
> http://www.aqua-mail.com
>
> On 1 March 2015 21:46:24 "Ron Marosko" <ron@rjr-services.com> wrote:
>>
>> This would be generally correct… for broadband fixed wireless (Canopy,
>> UBNT, et al.), having a graph of the client device RSSI/SNR value is helpful
>> when it comes to troubleshooting client connectivity issues when something
>> changes over time.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ve started playing a little with this on the Canopy side of things, have
>> identified the appropriate SNMP OIDs to poll/graph, but I don’t know how to
>> manipulate the graph/database stuff to get the graphs to show up neatly.
>> What I’ve got is really messy and not viable.
>>
>>
>>
>> …Ron
>>
>>
>>
>> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of
>> Eduardo Schoedler
>> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 8:59 PM
>> To: Observium Network Observation System
>> Subject: Re: [Observium] WiFi support progress
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-03-01 17:43 GMT-03:00 Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org>:
>>
>> How usable is it?
>>
>>
>>
>> For an WISP? I think it's good to have client's CCQ, for example.
>>
>> Client's signal its good too.
>>
>>
>>
>> And that's all, folks. :)
>>
>>
>>
>> But IMHO it's a waste of time, since there is Aircontrol from Ubnt and
>> does all you need, including manage this devices.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Eduardo Schoedler
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> observium mailing list
>> observium@observium.org
>> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
>
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium