I have stacked switches, it works fine. But implementations vary.
Takes 21 seconds for a stack of 4 52-port powerconnects (!) including sensors, cpu, memory etc. I don't see a problem here, even though it needs counters and such from the other devices there is nothing special as far as SNMP is concerned, it just works.
Tom
On 11/13/2014 06:20 PM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Stacking switches is pretty naive.
adam.
------ Original Message ------ From: "Raphael Mazelier" raph@futomaki.net To: observium@observium.org Sent: 11/12/2014 4:09:49 AM Subject: Re: [Observium] Performance
Observium is great tool, have a nice gui, made plenty of things... But the poller is "naive".
For example I have a couple of stacked EX3300 I cannot poll with observium (the snmp is slow on this equipemnt ok).
Think about that : in observium the poll of this equipment take more than 5min (so it is unusable), in cacti with spine 20s.
Doing snmpbulwalk on all oid is not always the better solution....
Le 11/11/14 22:12, Spencer Gaw a écrit :
Oh great, this guy again...
Regards,
SG
On 11/11/2014 1:58 PM, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
I'm working on about 20 times better poller for Observium, current one is awful. Mysql should not be a bottleneck, I guess.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium