![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/58095c49b614a24c75fb269032315dc1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
OSPF/ISIS are link-state. Why don't you monitor only the interface that is running it?
2015-02-19 23:21 GMT-02:00 Ben Hohnke settra+observium@gmail.com:
I've had a think about this.. As it's not BGP, you can't alert on peer state, but if you define a neighbour's via entity match, such as "router-id match 10.10.*", you could do a "exists eq true" for the test, or "status eq full"
ISIS would be pretty much the same as OSPF
Thoughts?
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
How would one go about alerting for these?
The problem we have with most of the things we don't currently alert on is simply that it's not obvious *how* we should alert on them.
adam.
On 20/02/2015 01:02:53, Ben Hohnke settra+observium@gmail.com wrote: Are there any plans to add an alert checker for OSPF/IGP Neighbor state changes? The BGP alerts checkers are great, however I'm looking for a similar thing for IGP.
Alternatively, Does anyone know of a solution for alerting IGP neighbour state changes? I have 100-200 routers I would need to monitor.
Thanks in advance,
Ben _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium