I'm not sure... On 08/01/2016 15:52:48, Tom Laermans tom.laermans@powersource.cx wrote: Might be different rancid v2 (asa) vs v3 (cisco) ?
Do we need 2 mapping tables? We already have a setting for v2 and v3 (for the separator).
Tom
On 2016-01-08 16:51, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Hmm. This is annoying, there are rancid installs which only work with this set to ASA!
I've set it back to cisco, since that was our original setting.
adam. On 08/01/2016 11:23:54, David Wilkinson observium@noroutetohost.net [mailto:observium@noroutetohost.net] wrote: Hi,
We have recently updated our version and the generate rancid script is now using the wrong type for the Cisco ASA devices. The type used for the Cisco ASA should be "cisco", it has recently changed so it sets the type to be "asa" This causes rancid to fail with an unknown type. Can this be corrected?
We are using rancid 3.1. Observium: 0.16.1.7396 (rolling)
Regards
David
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]