Hello Tom,
Always happy to help. I’ll keep you posted.
Best regards.
Le 10/10/2017 13:29, « observium au nom de Tom Laermans » <observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de tom.laermans@powersource.cx> a écrit :
Hi Youssef,
Thanks for the followups! I'm sure not only you but plenty of others will enjoy the fruits of you getting this fixed.
KR, Tom
On 10/10/2017 10:53, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR wrote: > And the update : > > «Thanks for the update. I cannot commit for fix to be implemented on D120, but I will try to get in touch with engineering for possible fix in upcoming release . I have created the PR for your reference : PR 1313109 » > > Best regards. > > > > Le 10/10/2017 09:25, « Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR » ybzahr@prodware.fr a écrit : > > Hello community, > > So good news is that JTAC finally understood the issue and advanced TAC has taken over it. They have confirmed that the MIB is implemented on train code 17.3 : > > “As a Quick test , I have tested our latest version 17.3 in our lab to see if that have the fix for the SNMP issue . And it worked fine in our lab : > > {primary:node0} > root> show version > node0: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Model: srx4200 > Junos: 17.3R1.10 > JUNOS Software Release [17.3R1.10] > > {primary:node0} > root> show snmp mib walk ascii jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature > jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature.509 = 35 > jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature.510 = 34 > jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature.511 = 0 > jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature.512 = 0 > jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature.513 = 0 > jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature.514 = 0 > jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature.515 = 0 > jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature.516 = 32 > jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature.527 = 0 > ” > I’m pushing to have it implemented for train code 15.1X49. > > Best regards. > > > > Le 09/10/2017 16:17, « Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR » ybzahr@prodware.fr a écrit : > > Hi, > > After a lot of patience and a ton load of explanations, here are initial findings : > > “I was quickly able to reproduce the issue in LAB with SRX 4200 with 15.1X49-D80 version. Also checked for any known issue and there is none. I will elevate this to Advanced TAC to validate my findings and open a PR with the Engineering team.” > > Best regards. > > > > Le 03/10/2017 00:02, « Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR » ybzahr@prodware.fr a écrit : > > Dear Nick, > > Ticket number with the vendor is 2017-1001-0083. > > Best regards. > > > > Le 02/10/2017 22:33, « observium au nom de Nick Schmalenberger » <observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de nick@schmalenberger.us> a écrit : > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 01:09:49PM -0700, Nick Schmalenberger wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 04:18:53PM +0100, Adam Armstrong wrote: > > > SRX is less than 30 years old so they haven't had time to implement obscure features like optic sensors yet.. > > > > > > 😄 > > > > > > Adam. > > > > > > Sent from BlueMail > > > > > I have Juniper SRXs and EXs with both 1g and 10g optics in the > > same switch or firewall, and they consistently only expose > > sensors from the 10g optics (in JUNIPER-DOM-MIB), this is a > > snipping from snmpwalk on a SRX1400: > > snmpwalk ... IF-MIB::ifDescr > > IF-MIB::ifDescr.505 = STRING: ge-0/0/0 > > IF-MIB::ifDescr.506 = STRING: ge-0/0/1 > > IF-MIB::ifDescr.507 = STRING: ge-0/0/2 > > IF-MIB::ifDescr.508 = STRING: ge-0/0/3 > > IF-MIB::ifDescr.509 = STRING: ge-0/0/4 > > IF-MIB::ifDescr.510 = STRING: ge-0/0/5 > > IF-MIB::ifDescr.511 = STRING: ge-0/0/6 > > IF-MIB::ifDescr.512 = STRING: xe-0/0/7 > > IF-MIB::ifDescr.513 = STRING: xe-0/0/8 > > IF-MIB::ifDescr.514 = STRING: xe-0/0/9 > > IF-MIB::ifDescr.515 = STRING: ge-0/0/10 > > IF-MIB::ifDescr.516 = STRING: ge-0/0/11 > > > > snmpwalk ... JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentTable > > JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentRxLaserPower.512 = INTEGER: -384 0.01 dbm > > JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentRxLaserPower.513 = INTEGER: -161 0.01 dbm > > JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentRxLaserPower.514 = INTEGER: -126 0.01 dbm > > JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentTxLaserBiasCurrent.512 = INTEGER: 7838 0.001 mA > > JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentTxLaserBiasCurrent.513 = INTEGER: 7874 0.001 mA > > JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentTxLaserBiasCurrent.514 = INTEGER: 8142 0.001 mA > > JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentTxLaserOutputPower.512 = INTEGER: -267 0.01 dbm > > JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentTxLaserOutputPower.513 = INTEGER: -214 0.01 dbm > > JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentTxLaserOutputPower.514 = INTEGER: -206 0.01 dbm > > JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature.512 = INTEGER: 46 Celsius (degrees C) > > JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature.513 = INTEGER: 48 Celsius (degrees C) > > JUNIPER-DOM-MIB::jnxDomCurrentModuleTemperature.514 = INTEGER: 46 Celsius (degrees C) > > > > From the JUNOS command line I know that ge-0/0/11 does have all > > the needed sensors. I also have a EX4600 that has mixed 1g and > > 10g with the same behavior. I think its pretty annoying too so I > > hope your support case helps this be improved :) Let me know if > > theres a case number I can tell to my vendor also. Thanks. > > -Nick > > Someone in #juniper pointed me to this thread > https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-April/022969.html > and I also found https://thwack.solarwinds.com/thread/113303 > about this issue. Apparently JUNIPER-DOM-MIB was originally > written ONLY for XFP transceivers: > > 38 DESCRIPTION > 39 "Change XFP references to generic SFF in descriptions. Add > 40 DOM lane table." > 41 REVISION "200912230000Z" > 42 DESCRIPTION > 43 "Initial revision." > > Despite apparently search/replacing XFP with SFF in the MIB, it > doesn't actually work on SFP transceivers :( > -Nick > > > BENGELLOUN - ZAHR Youssef - Consultant Expert > Prodware France > T : +33 979 999 000 F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr > Web : prodware.fr > >
BENGELLOUN - ZAHR Youssef - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr Web : prodware.fr
_______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium@observium.org > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium@observium.org > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium