Not to mention that neither of them are presented on the Kickstarter supporters list, despite apparently having enough money to afford sup2ts :)
adam.
On 2013-05-02 18:37, Tom Laermans wrote:
Better start complaining to Cisco then; read carfully what Adam is saying.
If VRFs are discovered on 7k6 but not on 6k5, it's not Observium's fault, but buggy IOS... ;)
Tom
On 2/05/2013 19:34, Darius Seroka wrote:
I agree with Kris here, lots of vrfs out there on these things. I don't mind in the end, its not a critical feature but a nice to have. Theres more important things to be done at the moment.
-- Regards, Darius Jan Seroka dariusjs@gmail.com
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote: Tell Cisco. :D
Kristoffer Björk kristoffer.bjork@gmail.com wrote:
Not to be rude but there are alot of people doing routing with multiple VRF's in the 6500, with sup720 and sup2T etc it's actually quite nice as a router. I find it's much more common then the ASR's in enterprise networks that i've been working in.
Cheers. //K
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote: 6500? Why, that's a switch! No need for qa'd vrf snmp support there!
Muwhahaha.
Darius Seroka dariusjs@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
Has anyone got a Cisco 6500 series on observium with VRF's? I've recently been adding some cisco gear to observium and the vrf's don't get picked up. It did pick up VRF's from the pair of ASR1002
-- Regards, Darius _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [1]
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [1]
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [1]
Links:
[1] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium