On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 9:56:02 AM Tom Laermans <tom.laermans@powersource.cx> wrote:

Oh, it's -leave? I thought it was -unsubscribe.

There's only one mailman admin right now and I know he's in bed with the flu; hence my suggestion of solving it in the regular way :-)

On 12/02/2014 05:51 PM, Richard wrote:
Send a single email to observium-leave@observium.org from the email address you'd like removed. This should remove you.

On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 9:48:25 AM Katie Dutton <kdutton@asmtech.com> wrote:

Ignoring non-text/plain MIME parts
You are already subscribed! Is what it is telling me

Katie Dutton | Sales Support
+44 (0)1606 863707
kdutton@asmtech.com
www.asmtech.com

Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford,
Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom

ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the
personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please
notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure,
copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited
runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected
files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments.
ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Dutton
Sent: 02 December 2014 16:47
To: Observium Network Observation System
Subject: RE: [Observium] gaps in graphs

I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:

-----Original Message-----
From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans
Sent: 02 December 2014 16:45
To: Observium Network Observation System
Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs

Hi Katie,

You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.org.

This address is only documented on
http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended.

You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe.

Tom

On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
> STOP EMAILING ME!!
>
>
>
> Katie Dutton | Sales Support
> +44 (0)1606 863707
> kdutton@asmtech.com
> www.asmtech.com
>
>
> Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford,
> Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
>
> ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of
> this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not
> that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please
> notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute
> it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message,
> whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments.
> ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of
> ecaroh
> Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30
> To: Observium Network Observation System
> Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
>
>
> Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
>
> ecaroh
>
> Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller <observium@dynstatic.net>:
>
>> Free up disk IO
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh <lists@datenarbeiter.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
>>>
>>> I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
>>>
>>>
>>> ecaroh
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller <observium@dynstatic.net>:
>>>
>>>> When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
>>>>
>>>> Justin
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh <lists@datenarbeiter.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
>>>>>
>>>>> The poller runs not longer than a minute.
>>>>>
>>>>> `Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
>>>>>
>>>>> Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
> _______________________________________________
> observium mailing list
> observium@observium.org
> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium