Just for know:
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad
== .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1.2
UCD-SNMP-MIB::laLoad ==
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3
Load average is not CPU usage, this
metric is old as UNIX:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Load_(computing)cody
via observium wrote on 09.01.2020 00:43:
Observium
is polling the hrProcessorLoad, right?
If run that manually i'm getting exactly what is Observium graphing
(when i'm interpreting that correctly) - 3 cores at 100
root@observium-ce:~# snmpwalk -v3 -l authPriv -u xxx -a SHA -A xxx
-x
AES -X xxx 127.0.0.1 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad.196608 = INTEGER: 100
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad.196609 = INTEGER: 100
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad.196610 = INTEGER: 5
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad.196611 = INTEGER: 100
root@observium-ce:~#
versus:
root@observium-ce:~# snmpwalk -v3 -l authPriv -u xxx -a SHA -A xxx
-x
AES -X xxx 127.0.0.1 .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3
iso.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3.1 = STRING: "0.05"
iso.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3.2 = STRING: "0.07"
iso.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3.3 = STRING: "0.13"
root@observium-ce:~#
top - 22:42:48 up 1 day, 2:45, 2 users, load average: 0.05, 0.07,
0.13
On 2020-01-08 22:28, cody via observium wrote:
Still confused... the LXC Container im
running Observium on and polls
itself via SNMP has 4 cores assigned where 3 cores are graphed at
100%
all the time since the container is turned on - and it's now
explicitly the only Container/VM running on this hardware.
But if i manually run following SNMP query on the LXC Container i
get
the same values as TOP shows for 1/5/15 minutes:
root@observium-ce:~# snmpwalk -v3 -l authPriv -u xxx -a SHA -A xxx
-x
AES -X xxx 127.0.0.1 .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3
iso.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3.1 = STRING: "0.09"
iso.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3.2 = STRING: "0.06"
iso.3.6.1.4.1.2021.10.1.3.3 = STRING: "0.07"
root@observium-ce:~#
top - 22:17:18 up 1 day, 2:09, 2 users, load average: 0.09, 0.06,
0.07
This doesn't match what is graphed for the CPU cores in Observium
On 2020-01-08 03:05, adama--- via observium wrote:
There's no difference to how the two
versions operate when polling
these
things.
We can only show the data that the SNMPd provides to us. If the
number
being
returned is an instantaneous value instead of a 5 minute average,
the
act of
polling itself will affect the value.
But if you don't poll it, is it even turned on?
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium