Well, thats because we where used to cacti and its gui for years :) For now, I'll stick with Peters suggestion and see how it works for us. 20.000 ports have to be manageable somehow.
Chris
Am 09.10.2013 13:09, schrieb Adam Armstrong:
On 2013-10-09 10:54, Christian Hügel wrote:
Any chance to get an answer to this? We really want to get away from cacti but I didn't found a way to properly manage devices with many ports ( >500 Ports per device). Thanks
I'm not sure I would want to add an extra click to get at ports.
For a page with 350 ports it took 1.1 minutes with the "bits" graph type and 32 seeconds with the 'details' view.
The 'basic' view took 3.6 seconds to load.
Perhaps we should default to the 'basic' view for devices with large numbers of interfaces.
I don't think taking UI design tips from Cacti is a good idea. :)
adam. _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium