On 2013-10-09 20:45, Robbie Wright wrote:
Sander, thanks for pointing that out. I hadn't seen that in the configport types, at least reading into the documentation [3] it looks like
options yet and we tested some of them out yesterday. Between that and
tweaking some of the descriptions on the ports (transit, core, cust,
etc) we may be able to make some work.
Adam, it looks like you guys are planning to do custom parsers for
that. That would get us some of the flexibility in structuring as
well. Is that still on the roadmap?
We wrote one, the purpose of custom parsers is to write your own :)
adam.
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium