On 3 Aug 2018, at 19:33, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org> wrote:
_______________________________________________Try retyping the list, putting a space between each entry.
I can't quite test the JS from here.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMailOn 3 Aug 2018, at 18:02, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" <henrik.cednert@filmlance.se> wrote:Ah. Okay. I looked in the logs in the observing/logs folder but couldn’t find any clues there.
But if I understand you correctly, at the moment it might be broken and there’s not much I can do at my end?
--
Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance
Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯These are both new style, one has just been migrated to the new style from the old.
I'm fairly sure the new format actually uses an array to store the options with "IN", so when we display it we're not actually showing you how it's stored, but just using a human readable format.
It is odd that these options aren't being split into proper selection by the JavaScript though, perhaps something is broken elsewhere...
Adam.
Sent from BlueMailOn 3 Aug 2018, at 12:21, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" <henrik.cednert@filmlance.se> wrote:Hello
Running 18.8.9360 (3rd August 2018).
Noticed that “groups” have gotten a sweet ass looking upgrade! =))) Nice one!
But I have issues when building the groups. Thought it had to do with the “,” and “|” as separator, since that seems to have changed under the hood. So I tried to recreate an old rule and make the new one just like the old one. But when building it i end up at a blank page with the "Building groups memberships” heading. Nothing happens and when I refresh the page no sensors are in the group.
Am I missing something? Picture of the old working group and the new one I made.
What did I do wrong?
Old working rule. “|” as separator of hostnames under “association ruleset” but “,” once you enter the edit mode. Is this expeted behaviour?
Cheers and thanks
--
Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance
Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium