As my first message says, I've tried to contact Adam on his personal e-mail to get an idea for the reason for this attitude, to no avail.

One more time, I've not requested a new feature or anything else, I just reported an already-existing part of observium not looking correctly, asked if it's a leftover and planned to be reworked, as the similar BGP stats look fine, and even offered to work on it.

There are no $reasons for such $attitude, and it's not the first time it happens, so I wanted to know why, and how is this considered normal?

- D.


2013/11/3 Tom Henderson <tom@pack.co.nz>
Maybe take it offline gents? Of at least off list? http://xkcd.com/438/

A simple "Hi $user, this is covered on the wiki here: $url. Thanks for using observium." would be trivial to implement with any email templating system. Even "Sorry, $feature is not currently in the timeline because of $reasons." would be better than getting in an argument.

Cheers

Tom


--


If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not disclose, copy, or distribute any information contained in or attached to it, or take any action/inaction based on it. Please contact us immediately, and delete this email from your system. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and not of Pack & Company (NZ) Limited (the "Company"), however any intellectual property contained in or attached to this email is the property of the Company. Thank you.

_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium