Sorry, i think its false negative;) maybe simple tuning of function - "if the first char is non number, then ignore" would protect from such cases

On Friday, December 22, 2017, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org> wrote:
I've never seen a false positive like that, how on earth has that device managed to confuse simple numerical tests?

I suspect it's injecting a strange character before or after the number or something.

There isn't any way for this to happen, really, unless the device is returning a strange invisible character before or after the number... Oo

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail
On 22 Dec 2017, at 14:59, Edvinas K <edvinas.email@gmail.com target=_blank>edvinas.email@gmail.com> wrote:
Inline image 1
Hello,

Is there any explanation - why this alert came up ?

From device sensors info now i see this information:

Inline image 2


The NX-OS stack (again) sent wrong condition information and alert generated by the "greater than 0" rule ?

Is there are the way to minimaze these false positives ?

Thank you.






observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium