Sorry, i think its false negative;) maybe simple tuning of function - "if the first char is non number, then ignore" would protect from such cases
On Friday, December 22, 2017, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org> wrote:
I've never seen a false positive like that, how on earth has that device managed to confuse simple numerical tests?I suspect it's injecting a strange character before or after the number or something.There isn't any way for this to happen, really, unless the device is returning a strange invisible character before or after the number... OoAdam.Sent from BlueMailOn 22 Dec 2017, at 14:59, Edvinas K <edvinas.email@gmail.com target=_blank>edvinas.email@gmail.com > wrote:Hello,Is there any explanation - why this alert came up ?From device sensors info now i see this information:The NX-OS stack (again) sent wrong condition information and alert generated by the "greater than 0" rule ?Is there are the way to minimaze these false positives ?Thank you.
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ observium