![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/0fa97865a0e1ab36152b6b2299eedb49.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Aww, don't ignore those, sometimes they have useful information :)
(and should tend to come *after* the fixed interfaces of the device!)
adam.
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:12:34 +0400, Nikolay Shopik shopik@inblock.ru wrote:
Hi Adam,
Actually you right, it always been here. I just use on few devices sort by name while on most others just default sorting. Time to fill loopbacks and null into ignored, so they just won't show up.
On 29/11/11 17:58, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Hi Nikolay,
It's always been like this, it's alphabetic sorting. It's *always* irritated me too.
That's why we tend to sort on ifIndex as default. Atleast on
fixed-config
devices, and devices which have fixed ifIndex schemes, it sorts
properly.
Makes a mess of subinterfaces, tunnels and vlans though, which tend to get sequential as-they-were-created ifIndexes!
adam.
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:01:23 +0400, Nikolay Shopikshopik@inblock.ru wrote:
Hi,
Does sorting order recently changed on ports tab? When I sort by name
of
port right now it sort like this GigabitEthernet0/1 GigabitEthernet0/10 GigabitEthernet0/11 etc
but before it was 0/1, 0/2, 0/3, etc. _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium