These changes are picked up by the poller, not discovery :)
adam. On 28/12/2016 09:42:19, Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl wrote: Hi Tom,
thanks! Just updated from r8279 to r8296 and the problem is gone. It triggered a change after running the 'discovery -h' with good results;
With kind regards, Sander Koorneef
From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Tom Laermans tom.laermans@powersource.cx Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 16:55 To: observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags. This issue should be fixed in r8282.
Appears to be leftover debugging code, and not actually being returned by the device in question!
Tom
On 11/29/2016 01:35 AM, Sander Koorneef wrote:
Hi,
think I found it. When I run the poller for only that switch and other switches (ICX7xxx series), I see this: ##### Module Start: ports ##### o Caching Oids ifEntry ifXEntry ADSL-LINE-MIB EtherLike-MIB dot3StatsDuplexStatus
And this is what I see on a Brocade CER (and in the output of the poller I see descriptions and aliases);
##### Module Start: ports ##### o Caching OIDs ifDescr ifAlias ifName ifType ifOperStatus
So, it looks like something changed in Observium not to using the needed OID's? Or do I look in the wrong direction? Thanks in advance!
With kind regards, Sander Koorneef
From: Sander Koorneef Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 01:11 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags. Hi,
finished checking with SNMP. I have the following results (omitted a lot of blanks and private info with //). But nothing showed the mentioned port information stated earlier. Any tips? Maybe removing by hand somewhere in Observium? Thanks in advance!
root@observium:~# snmpwalk -On -v2c -c // 10.200.0.11 |grep 1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18. .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.1 = STRING: "idrac-bay1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.2 = STRING: "bay1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.3 = STRING: "bay1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.4 = STRING: "bay2.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.5 = STRING: "bay2.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.6 = STRING: "idrac-bay2.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.7 = STRING: "veeam1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.8 = STRING: "veaam1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.9 = STRING: "bay3.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.10 = STRING: "bay3.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.11 = STRING: "wifirouter-am3" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.12 = STRING: "bay4.//.net" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.13 = STRING: "bay5.//.net" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.14 = "" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.15 = "" // .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.267 = "" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.268 = STRING: "bay4.//.net" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.269 = STRING: "bay5.//.net" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.270 = "" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.271 = "" // END
With kind regards, Sander Koorneef
From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl [mailto:sander@unithost.nl] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 11:42 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags. Hi Adam,
I found the following port logs, there where only 3 lines for 1/2/3:
2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed (attrib): [type] -> cust; [descr] -> ommited; [circuit] -> CID2997; [speed] -> 500Mbit; [notes] -> Transporte 2 2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed: [ifAlias] '' -> 'Cust: ommited [500Mbit] (Transporte 2) {CID2997}' 2016-03-01 11:50:24 Interface changed: [ifMtu] '' -> '1500'; [ifSpeed] '' -> '10000000000'; [ifPhysAddress] '' -> 'cc4e24e5f3e5'; [ifAdminStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifOperStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifHighSpeed] '' -> '10000'; [ifPromiscuousMode] '' -> 'true'; [ifConnectorPresent] '' -> 'true'; [ifDuplex] '' -> 'fullDuplex'; [ifTrunk] '' -> 'dot1Q'; [ifVlan] '' -> '1'; [port_label] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet1/2/3'; [port_label_short] '' -> '10Gi1/2/3'; [port_label_base] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet'; [port_label_num] '' -> '1/2/3'; [ifLastChange] '2016-03-01 11:45:44' -> '2016-02-27 02:05:01'
4 lines for 1/2/4;
2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed (attrib): [type] -> cust; [descr] -> ommited; [circuit] -> CID2995); [speed] -> 500Mbit; [notes] -> Transporte 1) {CID2995 2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed: [ifAlias] '' -> 'Cust: ommited [500Mbit] (Transporte 1) {CID2995)}' 2016-03-01 17:25:25 Interface changed: [ifAdminStatus] 'up' -> 'down' 2016-03-01 11:50:24 Interface changed: [ifMtu] '' -> '1500'; [ifSpeed] '' -> '0'; [ifPhysAddress] '' -> 'cc4e24e5f3e6'; [ifAdminStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifOperStatus] '' -> 'down'; [ifHighSpeed] '' -> '0'; [ifPromiscuousMode] '' -> 'true'; [ifConnectorPresent] '' -> 'true'; [ifDuplex] '' -> 'fullDuplex'; [ifVlan] '' -> '1'; [port_label] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet1/2/4'; [port_label_short] '' -> '10Gi1/2/4'; [port_label_base] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet'; [port_label_num] '' -> '1/2/4'; [ifLastChange] '2016-03-01 11:45:44' -> '2016-02-27 02:02:36'
I also tried to disable and enable the port yesterday, but I don't see that in the logs. I am now trying to get the ifalias info from SNMP to test.
With kind regards, Sander Koorneef
From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org [mailto:adama@memetic.org] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 01:00 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags. Is observium trying to clear tge port description for this port every 5 mins? (You can see in the event log for the port).
If so, its an observium bug. If not, it's a vendor bug reporting incorrect ifAlias.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail [http://www.bluemail.me/r] On 27 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Sander Koorneef <sander@unithost.nl [mailto:sander@unithost.nl]> wrote: Hi guys,
I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium recognizes it as a Customer and some other details. But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label (1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and also without a label. Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the first place. The question: how can I clean this up?
I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but cannot remember the version of it :(
Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.
With kind regards, Sander Koorneef
observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium] _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]