On 19.02.2015 19:20, SCHEIN David wrote:

Yes but I have the same result.

I think this peer reported as 0.0.0.0 (remote router ID 0.0.0.0).
Such peers ignored, there is no use to monitor their.

The state of the BGP session is particular:

BGP neighbor is 178.16.168.224,  remote AS 34177, external link

Member of peer-group CELESTE for session parameters

  BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0

  BGP state = Active

  Neighbor sessions:

    0 active, is not multisession capable (disabled)

    Stateful switchover support enabled: NO for session 0

  Message statistics:

    InQ depth is 0

    OutQ depth is 0

   

                         Sent       Rcvd

    Opens:                  0          0

    Notifications:          0          0

    Updates:                0          0

    Keepalives:             0          0

    Route Refresh:          0          0

    Total:                  0          0

 

 

 

 

De : observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] De la part de Mike Stupalov
Envoyé : jeudi 19 février 2015 17:17
À : observium@observium.org
Objet : Re: [Observium] Observium didn't see down BGP session

 

On 19.02.2015 19:12, SCHEIN David wrote:

Thx I have upgraded to 6292

But I still don’t have the BGP peer in default:

./discovery.php -m bgp-peers -h all


 

Best regards

 

David

 

De : observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] De la part de Mike Stupalov
Envoyé : jeudi 19 février 2015 16:52
À : Observium Network Observation System
Objet : Re: [Observium] Observium didn't see down session

 

Hi,

 you use community edition?

These sessions were ignored earlier, now fixed in Pro edition (r6292).

On 19.02.2015 18:14, SCHEIN David wrote:

Hello,

 

 

We have a router with BGP connections:

 

BGP router identifier 93.92.104.3, local AS number 44527

BGP table version is 42186637, main routing table version 42186637

522626 network entries using 75258144 bytes of memory

763445 path entries using 61075600 bytes of memory

121177/84076 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 17449488 bytes of memory

107956 BGP AS-PATH entries using 3836728 bytes of memory

0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory

0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory

BGP using 157619960 total bytes of memory

BGP activity 1587733/1065103 prefixes, 33361988/32598543 paths, scan interval 60 secs

 

Neighbor        V           AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down  State/PfxRcd

93.92.104.1     4        44527 6067411 7389513 42186637    0    0 9w4d       435068

93.92.104.2     4        44527 9203357 7389505 42186637    0    0 9w4d       128861

93.92.104.4     4        44527 8811008 7352080 42186637    0    0 9w3d       199512

178.16.168.224  4        34177       0       0        1    0    0 1d01h    Active

178.16.168.225  4        34177       0       0        1    0    0 1d01h    Active

 

 

But we cannot see on observium :

cid:part1.07050206.01010900@observium.org

I don’t understand this behavior…

 

Thx in advance

 

Best regards

 

 

dschein-fr

 





_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium





-- 
Mike Stupalov
http://observium.org




_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium




-- 
Mike Stupalov
http://observium.org


_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium


-- 
Mike Stupalov
http://observium.org