Now that I’m working through this, I guess what I’m looking for is more in the line of dependencies…. Given a bunch of remote sites, I want to know if an individual piece of remote equipment is down, *but* if the circuit to that remote site is down, I don’t want 20 separate alerts for each of those 20 remote devices, I just want the alert for the primary router at that site, and suppress the alerts for the devices behind that router.
Maybe that’s one of the future things? 😉
Thank you!
…Ron
From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 10:15 AM To: 'Observium' observium@observium.org Cc: 'Observium' observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] Nested alert device matching?
Create two separate associations?
This will be easier in future. But today you need to make two separate associations.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=10066
On 13 Jul 2017, at 16:12, Ron Marosko <ron@rjr-services.com mailto:ron@rjr-services.com > wrote:
Howdy Guys,
I’m trying to figure out how I can build a “nested” for lack of better description device matching script. For example, “type equals network AND hostname match *domain1.com*”. Or, “type equals network AND hostname notmatch *domain2.com*”.
I can’t just use a “hostname match *domain1.com*” because I also have devices in other groups with the same hostname match, but don’t want to alert-check on those other groups.
I’m sure there’s a way to do this, I’m just not figuring it out, and apparently my search-fu is weak.
Thanks,
Ron
--
Ron Marosko, Jr.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CCIE No. 4526 (R/S), NN5DX
Senior Network Engineer
RJR Services, Inc.
1108 West Dickinson Blvd, Suite A
Fort Stockton, TX 79735 USA
o: +1 432 336 5600 x115
c: +1 432 290 6344
e: mailto:ron@rjr-services.com ron@rjr-services.com
pgp pubkey: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x778B3B0258AB8B5C 0x58AB8B5C
"To know me is to fly with me."