Its largely unreliable because it relies on parts of the poller code working properly when run as the apache process.<br><br>We rarely test it, and a lot of that code is horrific to debug.<br><br>Adam.<br><br>Alex Pressé &lt;alex.presse@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br><br><div dir="ltr">While the web interface has always been reliable enough for me; I&#39;ll trust that Adam and Tom are more intimately familiar with the dirty details :)<div style><br></div><div style>If it breaks, they&#39;re going to rightfully say &quot;told you so&quot;. </div>
<div style><br></div><div style>From this day forward I shall use the command line.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Sander Steffann <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:sander@steffann.nl" target="_blank">sander@steffann.nl</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
&gt; On 06/06/2013 10:25 PM, Adam Armstrong wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; I still don&#39;t think we should allow adding of devices on the web interface. It&#39;s never been reliable.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; The only device i ever added from the command line was the Observium server itself.  Everything else i add via the GUI.  I&#39;ve never found it unreliable at all.<br>
<br>
</div>+1<br>
<br>
Has always been reliable for me<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">Sander<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
observium mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:observium@observium.org">observium@observium.org</a><br>
<a href="http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium" target="_blank">http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Alex Presse<br>&quot;How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?&quot;
</div>