That looks like it might be a Brocade device - if it's part of a LAG the description may be configured under the LAG configuration using port-name.
On 28 November 2016 at 20:42, Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl wrote:
Hi Adam,
I found the following port logs, there where only 3 lines for 1/2/3:
2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed (attrib): [type] -> cust; [descr] -> ommited; [circuit] -> CID2997; [speed] -> 500Mbit; [notes] -> Transporte 2 2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed: [ifAlias] '' -> 'Cust: ommited [500Mbit] (Transporte 2) {CID2997}' 2016-03-01 11:50:24 Interface changed: [ifMtu] '' -> '1500'; [ifSpeed] '' -> '10000000000'; [ifPhysAddress] '' -> 'cc4e24e5f3e5'; [ifAdminStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifOperStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifHighSpeed] '' -> '10000'; [ifPromiscuousMode] '' -> 'true'; [ifConnectorPresent] '' -> 'true'; [ifDuplex] '' -> 'fullDuplex'; [ifTrunk] '' -> 'dot1Q'; [ifVlan] '' -> '1'; [port_label] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet1/2/3'; [port_label_short] '' -> '10Gi1/2/3'; [port_label_base] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet'; [port_label_num] '' -> '1/2/3'; [ifLastChange] '2016-03-01 11:45:44' -> '2016-02-27 02:05:01'
4 lines for 1/2/4;
2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed (attrib): [type] -> cust; [descr] -> ommited; [circuit] -> CID2995); [speed] -> 500Mbit; [notes] -> Transporte 1) {CID2995 2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed: [ifAlias] '' -> 'Cust: ommited [500Mbit] (Transporte 1) {CID2995)}' 2016-03-01 17:25:25 Interface changed: [ifAdminStatus] 'up' -> 'down' 2016-03-01 11:50:24 Interface changed: [ifMtu] '' -> '1500'; [ifSpeed] '' -> '0'; [ifPhysAddress] '' -> 'cc4e24e5f3e6'; [ifAdminStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifOperStatus] '' -> 'down'; [ifHighSpeed] '' -> '0'; [ifPromiscuousMode] '' -> 'true'; [ifConnectorPresent] '' -> 'true'; [ifDuplex] '' -> 'fullDuplex'; [ifVlan] '' -> '1'; [port_label] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet1/2/4'; [port_label_short] '' -> '10Gi1/2/4'; [port_label_base] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet'; [port_label_num] '' -> '1/2/4'; [ifLastChange] '2016-03-01 11:45:44' -> '2016-02-27 02:02:36'
I also tried to disable and enable the port yesterday, but I don't see that in the logs. I am now trying to get the ifalias info from SNMP to test.
With kind regards, Sander Koorneef
*From:* observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2016 01:00 *To:* Observium Network Observation System *Subject:* Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.
Is observium trying to clear tge port description for this port every 5 mins? (You can see in the event log for the port).
If so, its an observium bug. If not, it's a vendor bug reporting incorrect ifAlias.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r On 27 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl wrote:
Hi guys,
I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium recognizes it as a Customer and some other details.
But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label (1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and also without a label.
Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the first place. The question: how can I clean this up?
I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but cannot remember the version of it :(
Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.
With kind regards, Sander Koorneef
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium