"observium"
<observium-bounces@observium.org>
wrote on 12.11.2014 12:50:42:


> From: Simon Schmitz <schmitz@eseven.de>
> To: Observium Network Observation System
<observium@observium.org>
> Date: 12.11.2014 12:52
> Subject: Re: [Observium] Performance
> Sent by: "observium"
<observium-bounces@observium.org>
> 

> Cluster ? You mean virtual chassis 


> 

> Am 12.11.2014 um 11:47 schrieb Pekka.Panula@sofor.fi:


> Hi 

> 

> I got cluster EXP2200 (two switches) series, pollin time 160 

> seconds, and EXP4550 (four switches cluster), polling time about 

> near 500 seconds.... 

> I even have disabled polling from that four switch cluster because


> Observium is so slow polling it. 

> 

> "observium" <observium-bounces@observium.org> wrote
on 12.11.2014 12:40:57:

> 

> > From: Simon Schmitz <schmitz@eseven.de> 

> > To: Observium Network Observation System
<observium@observium.org>


> > Date: 12.11.2014 12:42 

> > Subject: Re: [Observium] Performance 

> > Sent by: "observium"
<observium-bounces@observium.org>


> > 

> > We have juniper ex3300 and ex4200 and the polling time is 25sec.

> > 

> > 
http://www.observium.org/wiki/Hardware_Scaling


> > 

> > 

> > > Am 12.11.2014 um 11:10 schrieb Raphael Mazelier
<raph@futomaki.net>:

> > > 

> > > Observium is great tool, have a nice gui, made plenty of
things...

> > > But the poller is "naive".

> > > 

> > > For example I have a couple of stacked EX3300 I cannot poll
with 

> > observium (the snmp is slow on this equipemnt ok).

> > > 

> > > Think about that : in observium the poll of this equipment
take 

> > more than 5min (so it is unusable), in cacti with spine 20s.

> > > 

> > > Doing snmpbulwalk on all oid is not always the better
solution....

> > > 

> > > 

> > > Le 11/11/14 22:12, Spencer Gaw a écrit :

> > >> Oh great, this guy again...

> > >> 

> > >> Regards,

> > >> 

> > >> SG

> > >> 

> > >>> On 11/11/2014 1:58 PM, Alex Povolotsky wrote:

> > >>> I'm working on about 20 times better poller for
Observium, current one

> > >>> is awful. Mysql should not be a bottleneck, I guess.

> > > _______________________________________________

> > > observium mailing list

> > > observium@observium.org

> > > 
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium


> > _______________________________________________

> > observium mailing list

> > observium@observium.org

> > 
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
> _______________________________________________

> observium mailing list

> observium@observium.org

> 
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium


> _______________________________________________

> observium mailing list

> observium@observium.org

> 
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium