![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/0fa97865a0e1ab36152b6b2299eedb49.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
2 Aug
2013
2 Aug
'13
11:50 a.m.
I think anyone who wanted something like this would be better served by paying attention to the svn changelog and only updating after a day or two of inactivity. All of the information needed is available.
We won't adopt any practices which increase our workload without obvious benefit.
Delaying svn commits is the #1 cause of the "missing include" bug being committed.
Adam.
Tristan Rhodes tristanrhodes@weber.edu wrote:
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium