I'm not sure why, but this was being caused by the bootstrap-style progress bars left over from when the page was originally contributed to us. I replaced them with observium-style percentage bars and the issue went away.
\o/
adam.
Sent from Mailbird [http://www.getmailbird.com/?utm_source=Mailbird&utm_medium=email&utm...] On 25/11/2016 20:46:22, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote: Chrome's debugging tools might help.
That's probably one of the simplest pages we have, though.
I see ~10% CPU load on this page. It seems to be repeatedly repainting the page after a style recalculation, and I have no idea why.
If anyone understands how to work out what's happening, please have a look at Chrome's debugger.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail [http://www.bluemail.me/r] On 25 Nov 2016, at 20:03, Cederlund Tobias <Tobias.Cederlund@lansstyrelsen.se [mailto:Tobias.Cederlund@lansstyrelsen.se]> wrote: Well… I was simply asking if anyone had the same experience (on the version we were on…) Anyway… went to 8249, should be current stable, same issue.
IE: /overview/ - CPU at 0% /pollerlog/ - CPU up to 46 – 48% …and back to /overview/ - CPU back to 0% Chrome: /overview/ - CPU at 0% /pollerlog/ - CPU up to 33 - 36% …and back to /overview/ - CPU back to 0% Haven’t seen this behavior on any other pages. Strange. Regards, Tobias Från: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] För Adam Armstrong Skickat: den 25 november 2016 18:08 Till: observium@observium.org Ämne: Re: [Observium] High CPU-load on pollerlog-page This sounds unlikely. There's nothing dynamic on that page, just a couple of graphs and a lot of text. Also, why are you trying to report issues for an old version? adam. Sent from Mailbird [http://www.getmailbird.com/?utm_source=Mailbird&utm_medium=email&utm...] On 25/11/2016 09:39:49, Cederlund Tobias <tobias.cederlund@lansstyrelsen.se [mailto:tobias.cederlund@lansstyrelsen.se]> wrote: Hi We’re experiencing high CPU-load for the browser-process when having the /pollerlog-page open. In IE there is a +45% raise and in Chrome (54) a +30% raise. We’re running 8086. Is anyone else experiencing the same issue? Bug? Regards, Tobias
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]