Ok. Thanks. Seems good after removing the %. Appreciate the assistance.
-chip
You put a % sign in the rule definition. The number should be a number, the % turns it in to a string, and will have unexpected results.
On 2014-01-23 00:28, Chip Pleasants wrote:
Sorry I sent the previous message prematurely. My goal was to be_______________________________________________
alerted more that 80% cpu after 4 cycles. I'm not seeing cpu greater
than 80%. I am seeing cpu about 9%. Here's the email contents. Maybe
someone good verify my setting for this alarm are correct? is there
anything else provide? Thanks for your assistance!
ALERT Modify
Alert Processor Usage Greater Than 80%
Entity Processor 1
Conditions processor_usage gt 80% (9)
Metrics processor_usage = 9
Duration 18h 36m 21s
Device Device cisco.switch.net [2]
Hardware catalyst3560G48PS
Operating System Cisco IOS 12.2(55)SE5 IPBASEK9
Location DC
Uptime 113 days, 11h 2m 20s
-Chip
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Chip Pleasants <wpleasants@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm getting emails and not sure if its my alarm settings or something else is Here's the email contents. Maybe someone good verify my setting for this alarm are correct?
ALERT Modify
Alert Processor Usage Greater Than 80%
Entity Processor 1
Conditions processor_usage gt 80% (9)
Metrics processor_usage = 9
Duration 18h 36m 21s
Device Device cisco.switch.net [1]
Hardware catalyst3560G48PS
Operating System Cisco IOS 12.2(55)SE5 IPBASEK9
Location DC
Uptime 113 days, 11h 2m 20s
Links:
------
[1] http://cisco.switch.net
[2] http://cisco.switch.net/
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium