I agree with Kris here, lots of vrfs out there on these things. I don't mind in the end, its not a critical feature but a nice to have. Theres more important things to be done at the moment.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org> wrote:
Tell Cisco. :D
Kristoffer Björk <kristoffer.bjork@gmail.com> wrote:
Not to be rude but there are alot of people doing routing with multiple VRF's in the 6500, with sup720 and sup2T etc it's actually quite nice as a router. I find it's much more common then the ASR's in enterprise networks that i've been working in.
Cheers.//K
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org> wrote:
6500? Why, that's a switch! No need for qa'd vrf snmp support there!
Muwhahaha.
Darius Seroka <dariusjs@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi List,
Has anyone got a Cisco 6500 series on observium with VRF's? I've recently been adding some cisco gear to observium and the vrf's don't get picked up. It did pick up VRF's from the pair of ASR1002
--
Regards,
Darius
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium