Hi,
I upgraded this morning to the latest version and for some reason the graphs are now not being generated (rrd). I do see the files being updated (date and time looks as of now).
You can see here for example the CPUs are 100% (should be) however the graph shows nothing.
[image: Inline image 1]
Any ideas?
Thanks Laurence
Please ignore, my bad.
Regards Laurence
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Laurence Mayer laurence@istraresearch.com wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded this morning to the latest version and for some reason the graphs are now not being generated (rrd). I do see the files being updated (date and time looks as of now).
You can see here for example the CPUs are 100% (should be) however the graph shows nothing.
[image: Inline image 1]
Any ideas?
Thanks Laurence
Sorry for the back-and-forth, indeed it looks like it ran once and then stopped generating the graph.
Crontab is running as before, don't see the reason that RDD is not generating the graphs correctly.
Any ideas?
Thanks Laurence
[image: Inline image 1]
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Laurence Mayer laurence@istraresearch.com wrote:
Please ignore, my bad.
Regards Laurence
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Laurence Mayer < laurence@istraresearch.com> wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded this morning to the latest version and for some reason the graphs are now not being generated (rrd). I do see the files being updated (date and time looks as of now).
You can see here for example the CPUs are 100% (should be) however the graph shows nothing.
[image: Inline image 1]
Any ideas?
Thanks Laurence
I see the following in my logs, assuming it is somewhat related, but nos sure how.
Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state [Mon Sep 26 21:25:57.557593 2016] [core:notice] [pid 4727] AH00051: child pid 5330 exit signal Aborted (6), possible coredump in /etc/apache2 Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state [Mon Sep 26 21:26:12.574612 2016] [core:notice] [pid 4727] AH00051: child pid 4735 exit signal Aborted (6), possible coredump in /etc/apache2
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Laurence Mayer laurence@istraresearch.com wrote:
Sorry for the back-and-forth, indeed it looks like it ran once and then stopped generating the graph.
Crontab is running as before, don't see the reason that RDD is not generating the graphs correctly.
Any ideas?
Thanks Laurence
[image: Inline image 1]
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Laurence Mayer < laurence@istraresearch.com> wrote:
Please ignore, my bad.
Regards Laurence
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Laurence Mayer < laurence@istraresearch.com> wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded this morning to the latest version and for some reason the graphs are now not being generated (rrd). I do see the files being updated (date and time looks as of now).
You can see here for example the CPUs are 100% (should be) however the graph shows nothing.
[image: Inline image 1]
Any ideas?
Thanks Laurence
What would the Observium poller wrapper be coredumping into /etc/apache2?
Where did this error come from?
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail
On 26 Sep 2016, 13:27, at 13:27, Laurence Mayer laurence@istraresearch.com wrote:
I see the following in my logs, assuming it is somewhat related, but nos sure how.
Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state [Mon Sep 26 21:25:57.557593 2016] [core:notice] [pid 4727] AH00051: child pid 5330 exit signal Aborted (6), possible coredump in /etc/apache2 Fatal Python error: PyEval_AcquireThread: NULL new thread state [Mon Sep 26 21:26:12.574612 2016] [core:notice] [pid 4727] AH00051: child pid 4735 exit signal Aborted (6), possible coredump in /etc/apache2
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Laurence Mayer laurence@istraresearch.com wrote:
Sorry for the back-and-forth, indeed it looks like it ran once and
then
stopped generating the graph.
Crontab is running as before, don't see the reason that RDD is not generating the graphs correctly.
Any ideas?
Thanks Laurence
[image: Inline image 1]
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Laurence Mayer < laurence@istraresearch.com> wrote:
Please ignore, my bad.
Regards Laurence
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Laurence Mayer < laurence@istraresearch.com> wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded this morning to the latest version and for some reason
the
graphs are now not being generated (rrd). I do see the files being updated (date and time looks as of now).
You can see here for example the CPUs are 100% (should be) however
the
graph shows nothing.
[image: Inline image 1]
Any ideas?
Thanks Laurence
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
How can I get a PO to purchase observium. Yes, I know it is online but I still need PO. And is there a person I can call and speak with? or send email to (instead of using this mailing list)?
Regards,
Greg
I am sorry - I asked the incorrect question (sleepy).
What I need is a quotation.
On 9/30/2016 7:35 PM, greg lambert wrote:
How can I get a PO to purchase observium. Yes, I know it is online but I still need PO. And is there a person I can call and speak with? or send email to (instead of using this mailing list)?
Regards,
Greg
Good Day,
I realise that in observium 0.16.9 CE when I go under ports I am not seeing IP SLA, as a result I had to rolll back to 0.16.1.7533.
I run a large network which depends heavily on ip sla.
Please advise,
greg.
"WHY DOES THIS NOT WORK FOR FREE ON MY REALLY BIG IMPORTANT NETWORK?"
Yeah, ok.
adam. On 17/10/2016 10:42:17, greg lambert grelamen1@gmail.com wrote: Good Day, I realise that in observium 0.16.9 CE when I go under ports I am not seeing IP SLA, as a result I had to rolll back to 0.16.1.7533. I run a large network which depends heavily on ip sla. Please advise,
greg.
Don't be rude to me man...
You are entering into the professional arena where being rude will lose customers no matter how good your product is. If I am not a customer, I am a potential customer which everyone is until they buy.
I did purchase your product, but have not applied the professional licence as yet. I wanted to do a 2 stage upgrade, to the latest CE then to the professional.
It works for free in 0.16.1.7533, if you have removed it then just say so man... I am not new to open source, first a full featured free product is released to gain users then you hook them in by slowly removing features, watering down the free product to a piece of crap, just so the guys like me that is using it for free can buy it. Now don't cuss me out on this Mr. Rude Adam - remember, I am supporting you - I sincerely appreciate your work and abhor your manners (not the first time) and I fully understand that you need to make a living.
Just be polite enough to say, "sorry, we have removed that feature from the CE edition and ported it to the professional edition - you will have to purchase the professional edition to access that feature". And BTW, that feature is what showed my company that your product is worth it, since I already made the purchase for pro then I guess I have no reason to advocate for it BUT I would bet you will be losing some potential customers over this.
Regards,
Polite Greg
On 10/17/2016 10:58 AM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
"WHY DOES THIS NOT WORK FOR FREE ON MY REALLY BIG IMPORTANT NETWORK?"
Yeah, ok.
adam.
On 17/10/2016 10:42:17, greg lambert grelamen1@gmail.com wrote:
Good Day,
I realise that in observium 0.16.9 CE when I go under ports I am not seeing IP SLA, as a result I had to rolll back to 0.16.1.7533.
I run a large network which depends heavily on ip sla.
Please advise,
greg.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
IP SLA apparently wasn't supposed to be moved to pro, but it appears that it was (even though it really probably should have been supposed to have been moved).
We generally only move things to pro when they've been substantially rewritten, as this was.
adam. On 17/10/2016 11:14:48, greg lambert grelamen1@gmail.com wrote:
Don't be rude to me man...
You are entering into the professional arena where being rude will lose customers no matter how good your product is. If I am not a customer, I am a potential customer which everyone is until they buy.
I did purchase your product, but have not applied the professional licence as yet. I wanted to do a 2 stage upgrade, to the latest CE then to the professional. It works for free in 0.16.1.7533, if you have removed it then just say so man... I am not new to open source, first a full featured free product is released to gain users then you hook them in by slowly removing features, watering down the free product to a piece of crap, just so the guys like me that is using it for free can buy it. Now don't cuss me out on this Mr. Rude Adam - remember, I am supporting you - I sincerely appreciate your work and abhor your manners (not the first time) and I fully understand that you need to make a living. Just be polite enough to say, "sorry, we have removed that feature from the CE edition and ported it to the professional edition - you will have to purchase the professional edition to access that feature". And BTW, that feature is what showed my company that your product is worth it, since I already made the purchase for pro then I guess I have no reason to advocate for it BUT I would bet you will be losing some potential customers over this. Regards, Polite Greg
On 10/17/2016 10:58 AM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
"WHY DOES THIS NOT WORK FOR FREE ON MY REALLY BIG IMPORTANT NETWORK?"
Yeah, ok.
adam. On 17/10/2016 10:42:17, greg lambert grelamen1@gmail.com [mailto:grelamen1@gmail.com] wrote: Good Day, I realise that in observium 0.16.9 CE when I go under ports I am not seeing IP SLA, as a result I had to rolll back to 0.16.1.7533. I run a large network which depends heavily on ip sla. Please advise,
greg.
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
Hi Adam,
So I went ahead and installed the pro version (it was hell to download from the SVN, it kept on timing out and giving connection forcibly closed by host)... so my main problem is the intro page.
My previous CE intro page had a google map where for my 3 locations in one country I would do the gps coordinate for 1 device and anchor say 20 devices to each, so when I log into observium I am greeted with a google map showing 60 devices and the status (all green or all red if even a single device is down). The problem now is that
1) Only my anchor points show i.e. 3 devices that I put in the GPS instead of 60 devices.
2) Openstreets map has hijacked my google maps despite my having google maps in config file.
Now if I revert back to the CE then google maps automatically works with the same config file. How can I get it to work with the pro?
greg
On 10/17/2016 11:40 AM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
IP SLA apparently wasn't supposed to be moved to pro, but it appears that it was (even though it really probably should have been supposed to have been moved).
We generally only move things to pro when they've been substantially rewritten, as this was.
adam.
On 17/10/2016 11:14:48, greg lambert grelamen1@gmail.com wrote:
Don't be rude to me man...
You are entering into the professional arena where being rude will lose customers no matter how good your product is. If I am not a customer, I am a potential customer which everyone is until they buy.
I did purchase your product, but have not applied the professional licence as yet. I wanted to do a 2 stage upgrade, to the latest CE then to the professional.
It works for free in 0.16.1.7533, if you have removed it then just say so man... I am not new to open source, first a full featured free product is released to gain users then you hook them in by slowly removing features, watering down the free product to a piece of crap, just so the guys like me that is using it for free can buy it. Now don't cuss me out on this Mr. Rude Adam - remember, I am supporting you - I sincerely appreciate your work and abhor your manners (not the first time) and I fully understand that you need to make a living.
Just be polite enough to say, "sorry, we have removed that feature from the CE edition and ported it to the professional edition - you will have to purchase the professional edition to access that feature". And BTW, that feature is what showed my company that your product is worth it, since I already made the purchase for pro then I guess I have no reason to advocate for it BUT I would bet you will be losing some potential customers over this.
Regards,
Polite Greg
On 10/17/2016 10:58 AM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
"WHY DOES THIS NOT WORK FOR FREE ON MY REALLY BIG IMPORTANT NETWORK?"
Yeah, ok.
adam.
On 17/10/2016 10:42:17, greg lambert grelamen1@gmail.com wrote:
Good Day,
I realise that in observium 0.16.9 CE when I go under ports I am not seeing IP SLA, as a result I had to rolll back to 0.16.1.7533.
I run a large network which depends heavily on ip sla.
Please advise,
greg.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
how to get Google maps in frontpage back:
1. Get your own Google MAPS api key 2. set this config options:
$config['frontpage']['map']['api'] = 'google-mc'; $config['remote_api']['maps']['google']['key'] = 'API_KEY_FROM_STEP_1';
Google now always required API key, this is why it removed from default.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:35 PM, greg lambert grelamen1@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Adam,
So I went ahead and installed the pro version (it was hell to download from the SVN, it kept on timing out and giving connection forcibly closed by host)... so my main problem is the intro page.
My previous CE intro page had a google map where for my 3 locations in one country I would do the gps coordinate for 1 device and anchor say 20 devices to each, so when I log into observium I am greeted with a google map showing 60 devices and the status (all green or all red if even a single device is down). The problem now is that
- Only my anchor points show i.e. 3 devices that I put in the GPS instead
of 60 devices.
- Openstreets map has hijacked my google maps despite my having google
maps in config file.
Now if I revert back to the CE then google maps automatically works with the same config file. How can I get it to work with the pro?
greg
On 10/17/2016 11:40 AM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
IP SLA apparently wasn't supposed to be moved to pro, but it appears that it was (even though it really probably should have been supposed to have been moved).
We generally only move things to pro when they've been substantially rewritten, as this was.
adam.
On 17/10/2016 11:14:48, greg lambert grelamen1@gmail.com grelamen1@gmail.com wrote:
Don't be rude to me man...
You are entering into the professional arena where being rude will lose customers no matter how good your product is. If I am not a customer, I am a potential customer which everyone is until they buy.
I did purchase your product, but have not applied the professional licence as yet. I wanted to do a 2 stage upgrade, to the latest CE then to the professional.
It works for free in 0.16.1.7533, if you have removed it then just say so man... I am not new to open source, first a full featured free product is released to gain users then you hook them in by slowly removing features, watering down the free product to a piece of crap, just so the guys like me that is using it for free can buy it. Now don't cuss me out on this Mr. Rude Adam - remember, I am supporting you - I sincerely appreciate your work and abhor your manners (not the first time) and I fully understand that you need to make a living.
Just be polite enough to say, "sorry, we have removed that feature from the CE edition and ported it to the professional edition - you will have to purchase the professional edition to access that feature". And BTW, that feature is what showed my company that your product is worth it, since I already made the purchase for pro then I guess I have no reason to advocate for it BUT I would bet you will be losing some potential customers over this.
Regards,
Polite Greg
On 10/17/2016 10:58 AM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
"WHY DOES THIS NOT WORK FOR FREE ON MY REALLY BIG IMPORTANT NETWORK?"
Yeah, ok.
adam.
On 17/10/2016 10:42:17, greg lambert grelamen1@gmail.com grelamen1@gmail.com wrote:
Good Day,
I realise that in observium 0.16.9 CE when I go under ports I am not seeing IP SLA, as a result I had to rolll back to 0.16.1.7533.
I run a large network which depends heavily on ip sla.
Please advise,
greg.
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
OK, thank you - it works.
Just one simple maintenance question - it seems observium pulls lots of data, logs is 2.5 g and rrds is 9.5 g for 60 devices for 9 mths. Is this normal ,if not, is there any maintenance advice that you can give?
On 10/19/2016 9:08 AM, Mike Stupalov wrote:
how to get Google maps in frontpage back:
- Get your own Google MAPS api key
- set this config options:
$config['frontpage']['map']['api'] = 'google-mc'; $config['remote_api']['maps']['google']['key'] = 'API_KEY_FROM_STEP_1';
Google now always required API key, this is why it removed from default.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:35 PM, greg lambert <grelamen1@gmail.com mailto:grelamen1@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Adam, So I went ahead and installed the pro version (it was hell to download from the SVN, it kept on timing out and giving connection forcibly closed by host)... so my main problem is the intro page. My previous CE intro page had a google map where for my 3 locations in one country I would do the gps coordinate for 1 device and anchor say 20 devices to each, so when I log into observium I am greeted with a google map showing 60 devices and the status (all green or all red if even a single device is down). The problem now is that 1) Only my anchor points show i.e. 3 devices that I put in the GPS instead of 60 devices. 2) Openstreets map has hijacked my google maps despite my having google maps in config file. Now if I revert back to the CE then google maps automatically works with the same config file. How can I get it to work with the pro? greg On 10/17/2016 11:40 AM, Adam Armstrong wrote:IP SLA apparently wasn't supposed to be moved to pro, but it appears that it was (even though it really probably should have been supposed to have been moved). We generally only move things to pro when they've been substantially rewritten, as this was. adam.On 17/10/2016 11:14:48, greg lambert <grelamen1@gmail.com> <mailto:grelamen1@gmail.com> wrote: Don't be rude to me man... You are entering into the professional arena where being rude will lose customers no matter how good your product is. If I am not a customer, I am a potential customer which everyone is until they buy. I did purchase your product, but have not applied the professional licence as yet. I wanted to do a 2 stage upgrade, to the latest CE then to the professional. It works for free in 0.16.1.7533, if you have removed it then just say so man... I am not new to open source, first a full featured free product is released to gain users then you hook them in by slowly removing features, watering down the free product to a piece of crap, just so the guys like me that is using it for free can buy it. Now don't cuss me out on this Mr. Rude Adam - remember, I am supporting you - I sincerely appreciate your work and abhor your manners (not the first time) and I fully understand that you need to make a living. Just be polite enough to say, "sorry, we have removed that feature from the CE edition and ported it to the professional edition - you will have to purchase the professional edition to access that feature". And BTW, that feature is what showed my company that your product is worth it, since I already made the purchase for pro then I guess I have no reason to advocate for it BUT I would bet you will be losing some potential customers over this. Regards, Polite Greg On 10/17/2016 10:58 AM, Adam Armstrong wrote:"WHY DOES THIS NOT WORK FOR FREE ON MY REALLY BIG IMPORTANT NETWORK?" Yeah, ok. adam.On 17/10/2016 10:42:17, greg lambert <grelamen1@gmail.com> <mailto:grelamen1@gmail.com> wrote: Good Day, I realise that in observium 0.16.9 CE when I go under ports I am not seeing IP SLA, as a result I had to rolll back to 0.16.1.7533. I run a large network which depends heavily on ip sla. Please advise, greg._______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium <http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium>_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium <http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium>_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium <http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium>-- Mike Stupalov http://observium.org/
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:19:57 -0500, greg lambert wrote:
Just one simple maintenance question - it seems observium pulls lots of data, logs is 2.5 g and rrds is 9.5 g for 60 devices for 9 mths. Is this normal ,if not, is there any maintenance advice that you can give?
Take a look at the housekeeping script:
Thank you,
From time to time I get these breaks in the graphs. I thought it was my memory/cpu or rrd but I have other solutions on the server like cacti, smokeping... that does not exhibit the same... would you have any idea?
On 10/19/2016 1:01 PM, Paul Townsend wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:19:57 -0500, greg lambert wrote:
Just one simple maintenance question - it seems observium pulls lots of data, logs is 2.5 g and rrds is 9.5 g for 60 devices for 9 mths. Is this normal ,if not, is there any maintenance advice that you can give?
Take a look at the housekeeping script:
http://www.observium.org/docs/housekeeping/
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
This is caused by an SNMP query not completing properly. Usually timeouts or a device failing to reply properly.
Its usually an indicator of packetloss somewhere.
This happens with us an not other platforms because we rely on snmpbulkwalk, which is more efficient but also more prone to network issues.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail
On 19 Oct 2016, 15:48, at 15:48, greg lambert grelamen1@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you,
From time to time I get these breaks in the graphs. I thought it was my
memory/cpu or rrd but I have other solutions on the server like cacti, smokeping... that does not exhibit the same... would you have any idea?
On 10/19/2016 1:01 PM, Paul Townsend wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:19:57 -0500, greg lambert wrote:
Just one simple maintenance question - it seems observium pulls lots
of data,
logs is 2.5 g and rrds is 9.5 g for 60 devices for 9 mths. Is this
normal ,if
not, is there any maintenance advice that you can give?
Take a look at the housekeeping script:
http://www.observium.org/docs/housekeeping/
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
It could also be that you have overlapping poller processes. Do you have enough poller wrapper threads configured?
How does your poller information page look?
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail
On 19 Oct 2016, 15:48, at 15:48, greg lambert grelamen1@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you,
From time to time I get these breaks in the graphs. I thought it was my
memory/cpu or rrd but I have other solutions on the server like cacti, smokeping... that does not exhibit the same... would you have any idea?
On 10/19/2016 1:01 PM, Paul Townsend wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:19:57 -0500, greg lambert wrote:
Just one simple maintenance question - it seems observium pulls lots
of data,
logs is 2.5 g and rrds is 9.5 g for 60 devices for 9 mths. Is this
normal ,if
not, is there any maintenance advice that you can give?
Take a look at the housekeeping script:
http://www.observium.org/docs/housekeeping/
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Please see below
On 10/19/2016 4:07 PM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
It could also be that you have overlapping poller processes. Do you have enough poller wrapper threads configured?
How does your poller information page look?
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r
On 19 Oct 2016, at 15:48, greg lambert <grelamen1@gmail.com mailto:grelamen1@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you, From time to time I get these breaks in the graphs. I thought it was my memory/cpu or rrd but I have other solutions on the server like cacti, smokeping... that does not exhibit the same... would you have any idea? On 10/19/2016 1:01 PM, Paul Townsend wrote:On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:19:57 -0500, greg lambert wrote:Just one simple maintenance question - it seems observium pulls lots of data, logs is 2.5 g and rrds is 9.5 g for 60 devices for 9 mths. Is this normal ,if not, is there any maintenance advice that you can give?Take a look at the housekeeping script: http://www.observium.org/docs/housekeeping/ _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium------------------------------------------------------------------------ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
You can increase poller number ...
Em 19/10/2016 21:12, greg lambert escreveu:
Please see below
On 10/19/2016 4:07 PM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
It could also be that you have overlapping poller processes. Do you have enough poller wrapper threads configured?
How does your poller information page look?
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r
On 19 Oct 2016, at 15:48, greg lambert <grelamen1@gmail.com mailto:grelamen1@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you, From time to time I get these breaks in the graphs. I thought it was my memory/cpu or rrd but I have other solutions on the server like cacti, smokeping... that does not exhibit the same... would you have any idea? On 10/19/2016 1:01 PM, Paul Townsend wrote:On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:19:57 -0500, greg lambert wrote:Just one simple maintenance question - it seems observium pulls lots of data, logs is 2.5 g and rrds is 9.5 g for 60 devices for 9 mths. Is this normal ,if not, is there any maintenance advice that you can give?Take a look at the housekeeping script: http://www.observium.org/docs/housekeeping/ _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium------------------------------------------------------------------------ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
-- Fwd: a
*Alexandre Jeronimo Correa* / CEO _alexandre@onda.net.br mailto:alexandre@onda.net.br_ / Office +55 34 3351 - 3077
*ONDA INTERNET*+55 34 3351-3077 Av. Benedito Valadares, 217 – Centro – Sacramento – MG - BR _http://www.onda.net.br http://www.onda.net.br/_
Increase the number of poller wrapper threads to 2 or 4 from 1.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail
On 19 Oct 2016, 18:49, at 18:49, "Alexandre J. Correa (Onda)" alexandre@onda.net.br wrote:
You can increase poller number ...
Em 19/10/2016 21:12, greg lambert escreveu:
Please see below
On 10/19/2016 4:07 PM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
It could also be that you have overlapping poller processes. Do you have enough poller wrapper threads configured?
How does your poller information page look?
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r
On 19 Oct 2016, at 15:48, greg lambert <grelamen1@gmail.com mailto:grelamen1@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you, From time to time I get these breaks in the graphs. I thought it was my memory/cpu or rrd but I have other solutions on theserver
like cacti, smokeping... that does not exhibit the same... would you have any idea? On 10/19/2016 1:01 PM, Paul Townsend wrote:On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:19:57 -0500, greg lambert wrote:Just one simple maintenance question - it seems observiumpulls lots of data,
logs is 2.5 g and rrds is 9.5 g for 60 devices for 9 mths. Isthis normal ,if
not, is there any maintenance advice that you can give?Take a look at the housekeeping script: http://www.observium.org/docs/housekeeping/ _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
-- Fwd: a
*Alexandre Jeronimo Correa* / CEO _alexandre@onda.net.br mailto:alexandre@onda.net.br_ / Office +55 34 3351 - 3077
*ONDA INTERNET*+55 34 3351-3077 Av. Benedito Valadares, 217 – Centro – Sacramento – MG - BR _http://www.onda.net.br http://www.onda.net.br/_
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Thanks Adam/Alex
On 10/19/2016 7:13 PM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Fwd: a
Increase the number of poller wrapper threads to 2 or 4 from 1.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r
On 19 Oct 2016, at 18:49, "Alexandre J. Correa (Onda)" <alexandre@onda.net.br mailto:alexandre@onda.net.br> wrote:
You can increase poller number ... Em 19/10/2016 21:12, greg lambert escreveu:Please see below On 10/19/2016 4:07 PM, Adam Armstrong wrote:It could also be that you have overlapping poller processes. Do you have enough poller wrapper threads configured? How does your poller information page look? Adam. Sent from BlueMail <http://www.bluemail.me/r> On 19 Oct 2016, at 15:48, greg lambert <grelamen1@gmail.com <mailto:grelamen1@gmail.com>> wrote: Thank you, From time to time I get these breaks in the graphs. I thought it was my memory/cpu or rrd but I have other solutions on the server like cacti, smokeping... that does not exhibit the same... would you have any idea? On 10/19/2016 1:01 PM, Paul Townsend wrote:On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:19:57 -0500, greg lambert wrote:Just one simple maintenance question - it seems observium pulls lots of data, logs is 2.5 g and rrds is 9.5 g for 60 devices for 9 mths. Is this normal ,if not, is there any maintenance advice that you can give?Take a look at the housekeeping script: http://www.observium.org/docs/housekeeping/ _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium------------------------------------------------------------------------ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium-- *Alexandre Jeronimo Correa* / CEO _alexandre@onda.net.br <mailto:alexandre@onda.net.br>_ / Office +55 34 3351 - 3077 *ONDA INTERNET*+55 34 3351-3077 Av. Benedito Valadares, 217 – Centro – Sacramento – MG - BR _http://www.onda.net.br <http://www.onda.net.br/>_ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Guys you need to know this, if you not pass any number to poller-wrapper, than poller wrapper runs with (CPU count * 2) threads :)
And yes, 1 (single) thread for poller-wrapper does not make sense..
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
Increase the number of poller wrapper threads to 2 or 4 from 1.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r
On 19 Oct 2016, at 18:49, "Alexandre J. Correa (Onda)" < alexandre@onda.net.br> wrote:
You can increase poller number ...
Em 19/10/2016 21:12, greg lambert escreveu:
Please see below
On 10/19/2016 4:07 PM, Adam Armstrong wrote:
It could also be that you have overlapping poller processes. Do you have enough poller wrapper threads configured?
How does your poller information page look?
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r
On 19 Oct 2016, at 15:48, greg lambert grelamen1@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you,
From time to time I get these breaks in the graphs. I thought it was my memory/cpu or rrd but I have other solutions on the server like cacti, smokeping... that does not exhibit the same... would you have any idea?
On 10/19/2016 1:01 PM, Paul Townsend wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:19:57 -0500, greg lambert wrote:
Just one simple maintenance question - it seems observium pulls lots of data, logs is 2.5 g and rrds is 9.5 g for 60 devices for 9 mths. Is this normal ,if not, is there any maintenance advice that you can give?
Take a look at the housekeeping script:
http://www.observium.org/docs/housekeeping/
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
*Alexandre Jeronimo Correa* / CEO *alexandre@onda.net.br alexandre@onda.net.br* / Office +55 34 3351 - 3077
*ONDA INTERNET* +55 34 3351-3077 Av. Benedito Valadares, 217 – Centro – Sacramento – MG - BR *http://www.onda.net.br http://www.onda.net.br/*
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Appreciated Mike!
On 10/20/2016 12:34 AM, Mike Stupalov wrote:
Guys you need to know this, if you not pass any number to poller-wrapper, than poller wrapper runs with (CPU count * 2) threads :)
And yes, 1 (single) thread for poller-wrapper does not make sense..
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org mailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
Increase the number of poller wrapper threads to 2 or 4 from 1. Adam. Sent from BlueMail <http://www.bluemail.me/r> On 19 Oct 2016, at 18:49, "Alexandre J. Correa (Onda)" <alexandre@onda.net.br <mailto:alexandre@onda.net.br>> wrote: You can increase poller number ... Em 19/10/2016 21:12, greg lambert escreveu:Please see below On 10/19/2016 4:07 PM, Adam Armstrong wrote:It could also be that you have overlapping poller processes. Do you have enough poller wrapper threads configured? How does your poller information page look? Adam. Sent from BlueMail <http://www.bluemail.me/r> On 19 Oct 2016, at 15:48, greg lambert <grelamen1@gmail.com <mailto:grelamen1@gmail.com>> wrote: Thank you, From time to time I get these breaks in the graphs. I thought it was my memory/cpu or rrd but I have other solutions on the server like cacti, smokeping... that does not exhibit the same... would you have any idea? On 10/19/2016 1:01 PM, Paul Townsend wrote:On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:19:57 -0500, greg lambert wrote:Just one simple maintenance question - it seems observium pulls lots of data, logs is 2.5 g and rrds is 9.5 g for 60 devices for 9 mths. Is this normal ,if not, is there any maintenance advice that you can give?Take a look at the housekeeping script: http://www.observium.org/docs/housekeeping/ <http://www.observium.org/docs/housekeeping/> _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium <http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium>------------------------------------------------------------------------ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium <http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium> _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium <http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium>_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium <http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium>-- *Alexandre Jeronimo Correa* / CEO _alexandre@onda.net.br <mailto:alexandre@onda.net.br>_ / Office +55 34 3351 - 3077 *ONDA INTERNET*+55 34 3351-3077 Av. Benedito Valadares, 217 – Centro – Sacramento – MG - BR _http://www.onda.net.br <http://www.onda.net.br/>_ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium <http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium> _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium <http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium>-- Mike Stupalov http://observium.org/
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
partecipanti (6)
-
Adam Armstrong -
Alexandre J. Correa (Onda) -
greg lambert -
Laurence Mayer -
Mike Stupalov -
Paul Townsend