Re: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
What do you think they should report? Do you know that each port actually has a different Mac?
Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
they're powerconnects, not force10.... big difference. :)
i have multiple observium installations with force10 s25n, powerconnect 6224 and lots of different cisco switches.
on the force10 and powerconnects i see the same as you, with the same mac address on all interfaces. on my cisco devices theres different mac's on the ports.
so it's either a bug in FTOS and Powerconnect, or it's something deep within observium.
br
stefan milo ________________________________________ Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Alex Vitola [alex.vitola@gmail.com] Sendt: 9. april 2013 18:57 Til: L - Observium Emne: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
The same mac address for all port in all devices(dell 6248, force10). It's correct?
mysql> use observium; Database changed mysql> select device_id,ifDescr,ifPhysAddress from ports where device_id=5 limit 10; +-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+ | device_id | ifDescr | ifPhysAddress | +-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+ | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 1 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 2 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 3 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 4 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 5 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 6 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 7 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 8 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 9 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 10 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | +-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+ 10 rows in set (0.00 sec)
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
I'm just saying that cisco devices differ from dell devices in the mac reporting when used with observium. I don't use the feature anyways... I just wanted to give some input to the mail from Alex. :)
Br
Stefan
Sendt fra min iPad
Den 09/04/2013 kl. 20.36 skrev "Adam Armstrong" adama@memetic.org:
What do you think they should report? Do you know that each port actually has a different Mac?
Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
they're powerconnects, not force10.... big difference. :)
i have multiple observium installations with force10 s25n, powerconnect 6224 and lots of different cisco switches.
on the force10 and powerconnects i see the same as you, with the same mac address on all interfaces. on my cisco devices theres different mac's on the ports.
so it's either a bug in FTOS and Powerconnect, or it's something deep within observium.
brt
stefan milo ________________________________________ Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Alex Vitola [alex.vitola@gmail.com] Sendt: 9. april 2013 18:57 Til: L - Observium Emne: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
The same mac address for all port in all devices(dell 6248, force10). It's correct?
mysql> use observium; Database changed mysql> select device_id,ifDescr,ifPhysAddress from ports where device_id=5 limit 10; +-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+ | device_id | ifDescr | ifPhysAddress | +-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+ | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 1 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 2 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 3 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 4 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 5 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 6 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 7 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 8 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 9 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 10 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da | +-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+ 10 rows in set (0.00 sec)
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
You said there is a bug, did you even check?
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:40:52 +0200, Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
I'm just saying that cisco devices differ from dell devices in the mac reporting when used with observium. I don't use the feature anyways... I just wanted to give some input to the mail from Alex. :)
Br
Stefan
Sendt fra min iPad
Den 09/04/2013 kl. 20.36 skrev "Adam Armstrong" adama@memetic.org:
What do you think they should report? Do you know that each port actually has a different Mac?
Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
they're powerconnects, not force10.... big difference. :)
i have multiple observium installations with force10 s25n,
powerconnect
6224 and lots of different cisco switches.
on the force10 and powerconnects i see the same as you, with the same mac address on all interfaces. on my cisco devices theres different mac's on the ports.
so it's either a bug in FTOS and Powerconnect, or it's something deep within observium.
brt
stefan milo ________________________________________ Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Alex Vitola [alex.vitola@gmail.com] Sendt: 9. april 2013 18:57 Til: L - Observium Emne: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
The same mac address for all port in all devices(dell 6248, force10). It's correct?
mysql> use observium; Database changed mysql> select device_id,ifDescr,ifPhysAddress from ports where device_id=5 limit 10;
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| device_id | ifDescr | ifPhysAddress
|
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 1 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 2 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 3 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 4 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 5 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 6 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 7 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 8 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 9 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 10 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
10 rows in set (0.00 sec)
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
i said it was either the switches OR observium. maybe i should have used "issue" instead of "bug".
alex, fell free to chime in... i can't fight this guy alone... if you haven't noticed, adam has earned himself quite the reputation over time. :)
.stefan
________________________________________ Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Adam Armstrong [adama@memetic.org] Sendt: 9. april 2013 20:37 Til: Observium Network Observation System Emne: Re: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
You said there is a bug, did you even check?
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:40:52 +0200, Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
I'm just saying that cisco devices differ from dell devices in the mac reporting when used with observium. I don't use the feature anyways... I just wanted to give some input to the mail from Alex. :)
Br
Stefan
Sendt fra min iPad
Den 09/04/2013 kl. 20.36 skrev "Adam Armstrong" adama@memetic.org:
What do you think they should report? Do you know that each port actually has a different Mac?
Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
they're powerconnects, not force10.... big difference. :)
i have multiple observium installations with force10 s25n,
powerconnect
6224 and lots of different cisco switches.
on the force10 and powerconnects i see the same as you, with the same mac address on all interfaces. on my cisco devices theres different mac's on the ports.
so it's either a bug in FTOS and Powerconnect, or it's something deep within observium.
brt
stefan milo ________________________________________ Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Alex Vitola [alex.vitola@gmail.com] Sendt: 9. april 2013 18:57 Til: L - Observium Emne: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
The same mac address for all port in all devices(dell 6248, force10). It's correct?
mysql> use observium; Database changed mysql> select device_id,ifDescr,ifPhysAddress from ports where device_id=5 limit 10;
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| device_id | ifDescr | ifPhysAddress
|
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 1 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 2 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 3 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 4 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 5 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 6 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 7 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 8 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 9 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 10 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
10 rows in set (0.00 sec)
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Hi all,
I have a Cisco 1900 ISR running IOS 15.2(4)M3.
Up until recently Observium has been logging Memory Pools like a champ. After a recent update, Observium now reports Mempool usage as zero. Not sure which svn update might have caused the issue, but i guess fairly recent as it was working Sunday, but now isn't.
Debug poller run seems to be reading the memory value from the device correctly, but the sql update appears to be using blank values..
/usr/bin/snmpget -v2c -c public -OQUs -m CISCO-ENHANCED-MEMPOOL-MIB -M /opt/observium/mibs/rfc:/opt/observium/mibs/net-snmp:/opt/observium/mibs/cisco udp:bdr-r1:161 cempMemPoolUsed.1.1 cempMemPoolFree.1.1 cempMemPoolLargestFree.1.1 cempMemPoolUsed.1.1 = 70189636 cempMemPoolFree.1.1 = 278369404 cempMemPoolLargestFree.1.1 = 134581436
0% RRD[update /opt/observium/rrd/bdr-r1/mempool-cemp-1.1.rrd N::] SQL[UPDATE `mempools-state` set `mempool_polled` ='1365570955',`mempool_used` ='',`mempool_perc` ='0',`mempool_free` ='',`mempool_total` ='0',`mempool_largestfree` ='',`mempool_lowestfree` ='' WHERE `mempool_id` = '39']
Any help appreciated.
Matt.
On 10/04/2013, at 10:54 AM, Stefan Milo wrote:
i said it was either the switches OR observium. maybe i should have used "issue" instead of "bug".
alex, fell free to chime in... i can't fight this guy alone... if you haven't noticed, adam has earned himself quite the reputation over time. :)
.stefan
Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Adam Armstrong [adama@memetic.org] Sendt: 9. april 2013 20:37 Til: Observium Network Observation System Emne: Re: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
You said there is a bug, did you even check?
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:40:52 +0200, Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
I'm just saying that cisco devices differ from dell devices in the mac reporting when used with observium. I don't use the feature anyways... I just wanted to give some input to the mail from Alex. :)
Br
Stefan
Sendt fra min iPad
Den 09/04/2013 kl. 20.36 skrev "Adam Armstrong" adama@memetic.org:
What do you think they should report? Do you know that each port actually has a different Mac?
Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
they're powerconnects, not force10.... big difference. :)
i have multiple observium installations with force10 s25n,
powerconnect
6224 and lots of different cisco switches.
on the force10 and powerconnects i see the same as you, with the same mac address on all interfaces. on my cisco devices theres different mac's on the ports.
so it's either a bug in FTOS and Powerconnect, or it's something deep within observium.
brt
stefan milo ________________________________________ Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Alex Vitola [alex.vitola@gmail.com] Sendt: 9. april 2013 18:57 Til: L - Observium Emne: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
The same mac address for all port in all devices(dell 6248, force10). It's correct?
mysql> use observium; Database changed mysql> select device_id,ifDescr,ifPhysAddress from ports where device_id=5 limit 10;
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| device_id | ifDescr | ifPhysAddress
|
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 1 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 2 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 3 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 4 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 5 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 6 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 7 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 8 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 9 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 10 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
10 rows in set (0.00 sec)
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
its recent changes broke it when new memory pool added for unix host on summary page
On 10.04.2013, at 9:18, Matt Hucker matt@nrsolutions.com.au wrote:
Hi all,
I have a Cisco 1900 ISR running IOS 15.2(4)M3.
Up until recently Observium has been logging Memory Pools like a champ. After a recent update, Observium now reports Mempool usage as zero. Not sure which svn update might have caused the issue, but i guess fairly recent as it was working Sunday, but now isn't.
Debug poller run seems to be reading the memory value from the device correctly, but the sql update appears to be using blank values..
/usr/bin/snmpget -v2c -c public -OQUs -m CISCO-ENHANCED-MEMPOOL-MIB -M /opt/observium/mibs/rfc:/opt/observium/mibs/net-snmp:/opt/observium/mibs/cisco udp:bdr-r1:161 cempMemPoolUsed.1.1 cempMemPoolFree.1.1 cempMemPoolLargestFree.1.1 cempMemPoolUsed.1.1 = 70189636 cempMemPoolFree.1.1 = 278369404 cempMemPoolLargestFree.1.1 = 134581436
0% RRD[update /opt/observium/rrd/bdr-r1/mempool-cemp-1.1.rrd N::] SQL[UPDATE `mempools-state` set `mempool_polled` ='1365570955',`mempool_used` ='',`mempool_perc` ='0',`mempool_free` ='',`mempool_total` ='0',`mempool_largestfree` ='',`mempool_lowestfree` ='' WHERE `mempool_id` = '39']
Any help appreciated.
Matt.
On 10/04/2013, at 10:54 AM, Stefan Milo wrote:
i said it was either the switches OR observium. maybe i should have used "issue" instead of "bug".
alex, fell free to chime in... i can't fight this guy alone... if you haven't noticed, adam has earned himself quite the reputation over time. :)
.stefan
Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Adam Armstrong [adama@memetic.org] Sendt: 9. april 2013 20:37 Til: Observium Network Observation System Emne: Re: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
You said there is a bug, did you even check?
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:40:52 +0200, Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
I'm just saying that cisco devices differ from dell devices in the mac reporting when used with observium. I don't use the feature anyways... I just wanted to give some input to the mail from Alex. :)
Br
Stefan
Sendt fra min iPad
Den 09/04/2013 kl. 20.36 skrev "Adam Armstrong" adama@memetic.org:
What do you think they should report? Do you know that each port actually has a different Mac?
Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
they're powerconnects, not force10.... big difference. :)
i have multiple observium installations with force10 s25n,
powerconnect
6224 and lots of different cisco switches.
on the force10 and powerconnects i see the same as you, with the same mac address on all interfaces. on my cisco devices theres different mac's on the ports.
so it's either a bug in FTOS and Powerconnect, or it's something deep within observium.
brt
stefan milo ________________________________________ Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Alex Vitola [alex.vitola@gmail.com] Sendt: 9. april 2013 18:57 Til: L - Observium Emne: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
The same mac address for all port in all devices(dell 6248, force10). It's correct?
mysql> use observium; Database changed mysql> select device_id,ifDescr,ifPhysAddress from ports where device_id=5 limit 10;
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| device_id | ifDescr | ifPhysAddress
| +-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 1 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 2 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 3 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 4 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 5 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 6 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 7 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 8 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 9 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 10 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
| +-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
10 rows in set (0.00 sec)
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Is it broken for good, or are there plans to fix it in future?
Matt.
On 10/04/2013, at 4:19 PM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
its recent changes broke it when new memory pool added for unix host on summary page
On 10.04.2013, at 9:18, Matt Hucker matt@nrsolutions.com.au wrote:
Hi Stefan many people who start using obs for first time realize what their vendor suck at snmp. It's just obs start exposing all kind nonsense. As people rarely poll these things specially. And only do important things like interface that's It.
On 10.04.2013, at 4:54, Stefani Milo stefan@t.dk wrote:
i said it was either the switches OR observium. maybe i should have used "issue" instead of "bug".
alex, fell free to chime in... i can't fight this guy alone... if you haven't noticed, adam has earned himself quite the reputation over time. :)
.stefan
Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Adam Armstrong [adama@memetic.org] Sendt: 9. april 2013 20:37 Til: Observium Network Observation System Emne: Re: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
You said there is a bug, did you even check?
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:40:52 +0200, Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
I'm just saying that cisco devices differ from dell devices in the mac reporting when used with observium. I don't use the feature anyways... I just wanted to give some input to the mail from Alex. :)
Br
Stefan
Sendt fra min iPad
Den 09/04/2013 kl. 20.36 skrev "Adam Armstrong" adama@memetic.org:
What do you think they should report? Do you know that each port actually has a different Mac?
Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
they're powerconnects, not force10.... big difference. :)
i have multiple observium installations with force10 s25n,
powerconnect
6224 and lots of different cisco switches.
on the force10 and powerconnects i see the same as you, with the same mac address on all interfaces. on my cisco devices theres different mac's on the ports.
so it's either a bug in FTOS and Powerconnect, or it's something deep within observium.
brt
stefan milo ________________________________________ Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Alex Vitola [alex.vitola@gmail.com] Sendt: 9. april 2013 18:57 Til: L - Observium Emne: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
The same mac address for all port in all devices(dell 6248, force10). It's correct?
mysql> use observium; Database changed mysql> select device_id,ifDescr,ifPhysAddress from ports where device_id=5 limit 10;
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| device_id | ifDescr | ifPhysAddress
| +-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 1 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 2 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 3 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 4 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 5 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 6 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 7 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 8 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 9 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 10 Gigabit - Level | 5c260adb03da
| +-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
10 rows in set (0.00 sec)
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
It is quite normal for many switches to have identical MAC addresses on all ports.
My point was to actually check what the switch itself thinks its MAC addresses were before moaning
No one has bothered to do that, thus no one is bothering to look at their problem.
adam.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:27:40 +0400, Nikolay Shopik shopik@inblock.ru wrote:
Hi Stefan many people who start using obs for first time realize what their vendor suck at snmp. It's just obs start exposing all kind
nonsense.
As people rarely poll these things specially. And only do important
things
like interface that's It.
On 10.04.2013, at 4:54, Stefani Milo stefan@t.dk wrote:
i said it was either the switches OR observium. maybe i should have
used
"issue" instead of "bug".
alex, fell free to chime in... i can't fight this guy alone... if you haven't noticed, adam has earned himself quite the reputation over
time.
:)
.stefan
Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Adam Armstrong [adama@memetic.org] Sendt: 9. april 2013 20:37 Til: Observium Network Observation System Emne: Re: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
You said there is a bug, did you even check?
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:40:52 +0200, Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk
wrote:
I'm just saying that cisco devices differ from dell devices in the mac reporting when used with observium. I don't use the feature anyways...
I
just wanted to give some input to the mail from Alex. :)
Br
Stefan
Sendt fra min iPad
Den 09/04/2013 kl. 20.36 skrev "Adam Armstrong" adama@memetic.org:
What do you think they should report? Do you know that each port actually has a different Mac?
Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
they're powerconnects, not force10.... big difference. :)
i have multiple observium installations with force10 s25n,
powerconnect
6224 and lots of different cisco switches.
on the force10 and powerconnects i see the same as you, with the
same
mac address on all interfaces. on my cisco devices theres different mac's on the ports.
so it's either a bug in FTOS and Powerconnect, or it's something
deep
within observium.
brt
stefan milo ________________________________________ Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org
[observium-bounces@observium.org]
På vegne af Alex Vitola [alex.vitola@gmail.com] Sendt: 9. april 2013 18:57 Til: L - Observium Emne: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
The same mac address for all port in all devices(dell 6248,
force10).
It's correct?
mysql> use observium; Database changed mysql> select device_id,ifDescr,ifPhysAddress from ports where device_id=5 limit 10;
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| device_id | ifDescr |
ifPhysAddress
|
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 1 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 2 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 3 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 4 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 5 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 6 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 7 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 8 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 9 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 10 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
10 rows in set (0.00 sec)
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
This is true
There is no problem in observium. Is completely normal the same mac address in many ports ...
my fail :-\
Alex Vitola @alexvitola
2013/4/10 Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org
It is quite normal for many switches to have identical MAC addresses on all ports.
My point was to actually check what the switch itself thinks its MAC addresses were before moaning
No one has bothered to do that, thus no one is bothering to look at their problem.
adam.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:27:40 +0400, Nikolay Shopik shopik@inblock.ru wrote:
Hi Stefan many people who start using obs for first time realize what their vendor suck at snmp. It's just obs start exposing all kind
nonsense.
As people rarely poll these things specially. And only do important
things
like interface that's It.
On 10.04.2013, at 4:54, Stefani Milo stefan@t.dk wrote:
i said it was either the switches OR observium. maybe i should have
used
"issue" instead of "bug".
alex, fell free to chime in... i can't fight this guy alone... if you haven't noticed, adam has earned himself quite the reputation over
time.
:)
.stefan
Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org [observium-bounces@observium.org] På vegne af Adam Armstrong [adama@memetic.org] Sendt: 9. april 2013 20:37 Til: Observium Network Observation System Emne: Re: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
You said there is a bug, did you even check?
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:40:52 +0200, Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk
wrote:
I'm just saying that cisco devices differ from dell devices in the mac reporting when used with observium. I don't use the feature anyways...
I
just wanted to give some input to the mail from Alex. :)
Br
Stefan
Sendt fra min iPad
Den 09/04/2013 kl. 20.36 skrev "Adam Armstrong" adama@memetic.org:
What do you think they should report? Do you know that each port actually has a different Mac?
Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
they're powerconnects, not force10.... big difference. :)
i have multiple observium installations with force10 s25n,
powerconnect
6224 and lots of different cisco switches.
on the force10 and powerconnects i see the same as you, with the
same
mac address on all interfaces. on my cisco devices theres different mac's on the ports.
so it's either a bug in FTOS and Powerconnect, or it's something
deep
within observium.
brt
stefan milo ________________________________________ Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org
[observium-bounces@observium.org]
På vegne af Alex Vitola [alex.vitola@gmail.com] Sendt: 9. april 2013 18:57 Til: L - Observium Emne: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
The same mac address for all port in all devices(dell 6248,
force10).
It's correct?
mysql> use observium; Database changed mysql> select device_id,ifDescr,ifPhysAddress from ports where device_id=5 limit 10;
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| device_id | ifDescr |
ifPhysAddress
|
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 1 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 2 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 3 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 4 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 5 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 6 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 7 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 8 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 9 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
| 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 10 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
10 rows in set (0.00 sec)
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Nota bene guys, research your problem before posting!
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:06:21 -0300, Alex Vitola alex.vitola@gmail.com wrote:
This is true
There is no problem in observium. Is completely normal the same mac
address
in many ports ...
my fail :-\
Alex Vitola @alexvitola
2013/4/10 Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org
It is quite normal for many switches to have identical MAC addresses on all ports.
My point was to actually check what the switch itself thinks its MAC addresses were before moaning
No one has bothered to do that, thus no one is bothering to look at
their
problem.
adam.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:27:40 +0400, Nikolay Shopik shopik@inblock.ru wrote:
Hi Stefan many people who start using obs for first time realize what their vendor suck at snmp. It's just obs start exposing all kind
nonsense.
As people rarely poll these things specially. And only do important
things
like interface that's It.
On 10.04.2013, at 4:54, Stefani Milo stefan@t.dk wrote:
i said it was either the switches OR observium. maybe i should have
used
"issue" instead of "bug".
alex, fell free to chime in... i can't fight this guy alone... if
you
haven't noticed, adam has earned himself quite the reputation over
time.
:)
.stefan
Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org
[observium-bounces@observium.org]
På vegne af Adam Armstrong [adama@memetic.org] Sendt: 9. april 2013 20:37 Til: Observium Network Observation System Emne: Re: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports
You said there is a bug, did you even check?
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:40:52 +0200, Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk
wrote:
I'm just saying that cisco devices differ from dell devices in the mac reporting when used with observium. I don't use the feature anyways...
I
just wanted to give some input to the mail from Alex. :)
Br
Stefan
Sendt fra min iPad
Den 09/04/2013 kl. 20.36 skrev "Adam Armstrong"
What do you think they should report? Do you know that each port actually has a different Mac?
Stefan Milo stefan@zendata.dk wrote:
> they're powerconnects, not force10.... big difference. :) > > i have multiple observium installations with force10 s25n,
powerconnect
> 6224 and lots of different cisco switches. > > on the force10 and powerconnects i see the same as you, with the
same
> mac address on all interfaces. on my cisco devices theres
different
> mac's on the ports. > > so it's either a bug in FTOS and Powerconnect, or it's something
deep
> within observium. > > brt > > stefan milo > ________________________________________ > Fra: observium-bounces@observium.org
[observium-bounces@observium.org]
> På vegne af Alex Vitola [alex.vitola@gmail.com] > Sendt: 9. april 2013 18:57 > Til: L - Observium > Emne: [Observium] Mac Address Switch Ports > > The same mac address for all port in all devices(dell 6248,
force10).
> It's correct? > > > mysql> use observium; > Database changed > mysql> select device_id,ifDescr,ifPhysAddress from ports where > device_id=5 limit 10;
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
> | device_id | ifDescr |
ifPhysAddress
|
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
> | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 1 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
> | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 2 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
> | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 3 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
> | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 4 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
> | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 5 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
> | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 6 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
> | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 7 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
> | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 8 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
> | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 9 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
> | 5 | Unit: 1 Slot: 0 Port: 10 Gigabit - Level |
5c260adb03da
|
+-----------+------------------------------------------+---------------+
> 10 rows in set (0.00 sec) > > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium@observium.org > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
participants (5)
-
Adam Armstrong -
Alex Vitola -
Matt Hucker -
Nikolay Shopik -
Stefan Milo