Large number of ports on switch? Juniper VC/VCF EX/QFX
Hi,
I'm running into a problem when trying to view a junipersetup.
It is a virtual chassis fabric with 2x QFX51 and 2x EX43
When you open the device, in the list of ports, the last ones don't appear:
2/0/14, ge-2/0/15, ge-2/0/16, ge-2/0/17, ge-2/0/18, ge-2/0/19, ge-2/0/20, ge-2/0/21, ge-2/0/22, ge-2/0/23, ge-2/0/24, ge-2/0/25, ge-2/0/26, ge-2/0/27, ge-2/0/28, ge-2/0/29, ge-2/0/30, ge-2/0/31, ge-2/0/32, ge-2/0/33, ge-2/0/34, ge-2/0/35, ge-2/0/36, ge-2/0/37, ge-2/0/38, ge-2/0/39, ge-2/0/40, ge-2/0/41, ge-2/0/42, ge-2/0/43, ge-2/0/44, ge-2/0/45, ge-2/0/46, ge-2/0/47, ge-2/0/0.0, xe-0/0/0, xe-0/0/2, xe-0/0/0.0, xe-0/0/2.0, xe-0/0/1, xe-0/0/1.0, xe-0/0/3, xe-0/0/3.0, xe-1/0/0, xe-1/0/0.0, xe-1/0/1, xe-1/0/1.0, xe-1/0/2, xe-1/0/2.0, xe-1/0/3, xe-1/0/3.0, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
When I click on "Ports": I have a lot of "empty" rows at the end.
I also added a trunk-interface ( ae0 ) with does not appear in the list.
Is it possible the QFX/ex4300 is not yet recognised ?
I also have a (Juniper) switch with almost 600 ports with almost the same problem. ( 10x EX4200 )
Is there a port-limit ?
Thank you Kind regards,
Paul
Paul Meys Milla-IT - creative minds think alike Berkenrodelei 51 2660 Hoboken-Belgium paul@milla-it.bemailto:paul@milla-it.be http://www.milla-it.behttp://www.milla-it.be/ BE 0892.650.418 +32 498 62 19 94 IT: Hosting / Security / Network / Consultancy
?
I have a vfabric with both QFX5100 and EX4300 and it’s working like a charm.
You have to run 13.2X51-D21.1 on the QFX, the previous one is bugged like hell ( well, seems to be a Juniper constance since 6 months )
Raphael
On 15 Jul 2014, at 10:52, Paul Meys paul@milla-it.be wrote:
Hi,
I'm running into a problem when trying to view a junipersetup.
It is a virtual chassis fabric with 2x QFX51 and 2x EX43
When you open the device, in the list of ports, the last ones don't appear:
2/0/14, ge-2/0/15, ge-2/0/16, ge-2/0/17, ge-2/0/18, ge-2/0/19, ge-2/0/20, ge-2/0/21, ge-2/0/22, ge-2/0/23, ge-2/0/24, ge-2/0/25, ge-2/0/26, ge-2/0/27, ge-2/0/28, ge-2/0/29, ge-2/0/30, ge-2/0/31, ge-2/0/32, ge-2/0/33, ge-2/0/34, ge-2/0/35, ge-2/0/36, ge-2/0/37, ge-2/0/38, ge-2/0/39, ge-2/0/40, ge-2/0/41, ge-2/0/42, ge-2/0/43, ge-2/0/44, ge-2/0/45, ge-2/0/46, ge-2/0/47, ge-2/0/0.0, xe-0/0/0, xe-0/0/2, xe-0/0/0.0, xe-0/0/2.0, xe-0/0/1, xe-0/0/1.0, xe-0/0/3, xe-0/0/3.0, xe-1/0/0, xe-1/0/0.0, xe-1/0/1, xe-1/0/1.0, xe-1/0/2, xe-1/0/2.0, xe-1/0/3, xe-1/0/3.0, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
When I click on "Ports": I have a lot of "empty" rows at the end.
I also added a trunk-interface ( ae0 ) with does not appear in the list.
Is it possible the QFX/ex4300 is not yet recognised ?
I also have a (Juniper) switch with almost 600 ports with almost the same problem. ( 10x EX4200 )
Is there a port-limit ?
Thank you Kind regards,
Paul
Paul Meys Milla-IT - creative minds think alike Berkenrodelei 51 2660 Hoboken-Belgium paul@milla-it.be http://www.milla-it.be BE 0892.650.418 +32 498 62 19 94 IT: Hosting / Security / Network / Consultancy
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
On 15.07.2014 10:52, Paul Meys wrote:
Hi,
I'm running into a problem when trying to view a junipersetup.
It is a virtual chassis fabric with 2x QFX51 and 2x EX43
When you open the device, in the list of ports, the last ones don't appear:
2/0/14, ge-2/0/15, ge-2/0/16, ge-2/0/17, ge-2/0/18, ge-2/0/19, ge-2/0/20, ge-2/0/21, ge-2/0/22, ge-2/0/23, ge-2/0/24, ge-2/0/25, ge-2/0/26, ge-2/0/27, ge-2/0/28, ge-2/0/29, ge-2/0/30, ge-2/0/31, ge-2/0/32, ge-2/0/33, ge-2/0/34, ge-2/0/35, ge-2/0/36, ge-2/0/37, ge-2/0/38, ge-2/0/39, ge-2/0/40, ge-2/0/41, ge-2/0/42, ge-2/0/43, ge-2/0/44, ge-2/0/45, ge-2/0/46, ge-2/0/47, ge-2/0/0.0, xe-0/0/0, xe-0/0/2, xe-0/0/0.0, xe-0/0/2.0, xe-0/0/1, xe-0/0/1.0, xe-0/0/3, xe-0/0/3.0, xe-1/0/0, xe-1/0/0.0, xe-1/0/1, xe-1/0/1.0, xe-1/0/2, xe-1/0/2.0, xe-1/0/3, xe-1/0/3.0, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
When I click on "Ports": I have a lot of "empty" rows at the end.
I also added a trunk-interface ( ae0 ) with does not appear in the list.
Is it possible the QFX/ex4300 is not yet recognised ?
I also have a (Juniper) switch with almost 600 ports with almost the same problem. ( 10x EX4200 )
Is there a port-limit ?
I still keep this line in my configuration:
$config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^$/';
That is, don't consider interfaces that return empty name. It might've been cisco bug, so I don't know if it's applicable to your gear, but you have nothing to lose, try it.
Later we also learned about 'no virtual-template snmp', once again cisco specific directive, but you could try to find something of similar functionality on your OS.
Hi Zlatko,
Thanks,
I tried, now I can get a listing of all the ports with the graphs, except the interface-name is missing .. I'll investigate this later...
Regards,
Paul
________________________________________ Van: observium observium-bounces@observium.org namens Zlatko Calusic zcalusic@bitsync.net Verzonden: dinsdag 15 juli 2014 11:26 Aan: Observium Network Observation System Onderwerp: Re: [Observium] Large number of ports on switch? Juniper VC/VCF EX/QFX
On 15.07.2014 10:52, Paul Meys wrote:
Hi,
I'm running into a problem when trying to view a junipersetup.
It is a virtual chassis fabric with 2x QFX51 and 2x EX43
When you open the device, in the list of ports, the last ones don't appear:
2/0/14, ge-2/0/15, ge-2/0/16, ge-2/0/17, ge-2/0/18, ge-2/0/19, ge-2/0/20, ge-2/0/21, ge-2/0/22, ge-2/0/23, ge-2/0/24, ge-2/0/25, ge-2/0/26, ge-2/0/27, ge-2/0/28, ge-2/0/29, ge-2/0/30, ge-2/0/31, ge-2/0/32, ge-2/0/33, ge-2/0/34, ge-2/0/35, ge-2/0/36, ge-2/0/37, ge-2/0/38, ge-2/0/39, ge-2/0/40, ge-2/0/41, ge-2/0/42, ge-2/0/43, ge-2/0/44, ge-2/0/45, ge-2/0/46, ge-2/0/47, ge-2/0/0.0, xe-0/0/0, xe-0/0/2, xe-0/0/0.0, xe-0/0/2.0, xe-0/0/1, xe-0/0/1.0, xe-0/0/3, xe-0/0/3.0, xe-1/0/0, xe-1/0/0.0, xe-1/0/1, xe-1/0/1.0, xe-1/0/2, xe-1/0/2.0, xe-1/0/3, xe-1/0/3.0, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
When I click on "Ports": I have a lot of "empty" rows at the end.
I also added a trunk-interface ( ae0 ) with does not appear in the list.
Is it possible the QFX/ex4300 is not yet recognised ?
I also have a (Juniper) switch with almost 600 ports with almost the same problem. ( 10x EX4200 )
Is there a port-limit ?
I still keep this line in my configuration:
$config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^$/';
That is, don't consider interfaces that return empty name. It might've been cisco bug, so I don't know if it's applicable to your gear, but you have nothing to lose, try it.
Later we also learned about 'no virtual-template snmp', once again cisco specific directive, but you could try to find something of similar functionality on your OS.
-- Zlatko
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
participants (3)
-
Paul Meys -
Raphael Maunier -
Zlatko Calusic