Cisco ASA - inaccurate traffic for one specific interface

Hi guys,
I've added a new ASA to Observium. The issue is that for one interface no packets have been collected so far:
[image: Inline images 1]
But in the details you can see that traffic has been collected:
[image: Inline images 2]
The result is that the overall traffic graph is inaccurate (traffic should be ~600Mbit/s):
[image: Inline images 3]
Cheers

We can only record the data the device gives us.
Adam.
Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com
On 9 December 2015 12:17:02 Ben Maschke ben.maschke@shazam.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I've added a new ASA to Observium. The issue is that for one interface no packets have been collected so far:
[image: Inline images 1]
But in the details you can see that traffic has been collected:
[image: Inline images 2]
The result is that the overall traffic graph is inaccurate (traffic should be ~600Mbit/s):
[image: Inline images 3]
Cheers
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Is the port using 64-bit or 32-bit counters? It looks like it's just your asa doing it wrong, a debug poller log for the ports module would help...
Tom
On Dec 9, 2015 1:17 PM, Ben Maschke ben.maschke@shazam.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I've added a new ASA to Observium. The issue is that for one interface no packets have been collected so far:
But in the details you can see that traffic has been collected:
The result is that the overall traffic graph is inaccurate (traffic should be ~600Mbit/s):
Cheers

Nevermind, I've monitored the standby device instead of the primary one ^^ ... one of those days Oo
Thx
On 9 December 2015 at 12:56, Tom Laermans tom.laermans@powersource.cx wrote:
Is the port using 64-bit or 32-bit counters? It looks like it's just your asa doing it wrong, a debug poller log for the ports module would help...
Tom On Dec 9, 2015 1:17 PM, Ben Maschke ben.maschke@shazam.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I've added a new ASA to Observium. The issue is that for one interface no packets have been collected so far:
[image: Inline images 1]
But in the details you can see that traffic has been collected:
[image: Inline images 2]
The result is that the overall traffic graph is inaccurate (traffic should be ~600Mbit/s):
[image: Inline images 3]
Cheers
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
participants (3)
-
Adam Armstrong
-
Ben Maschke
-
Tom Laermans